У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно IDEA Compliance Explained: From Rowley to Endrew F | Special Ed Law Training или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Join NASET's first-ever Education Landscape Briefing with Dr. Alan G. Osborne, Jr. and Dr. Charles J. Russo as they break down the landmark Supreme Court cases that define special education law today. If you're a special education teacher, administrator, or parent navigating IEPs and IDEA compliance, understanding these cases isn't optional—it's essential. From zero-reject policies to what "appropriate" education really means, this 20-minute briefing covers the legal foundation of everything you do. ⭐ JOIN 40,000+ SPECIAL ED PROFESSIONALS: https://learn.naset.com/membership ✅ LANDMARK CASES COVERED: Timothy W. v. Rochester: The Zero-Reject Principle (no student can be denied services) Board of Ed. v. Rowley: Defining "Free Appropriate Public Education" (FAPE) Endrew F. v. Douglas County: Raising the bar beyond "trivial" progress Age 21 eligibility and adult education programs GED vs. standard diploma requirements Extended school year and extended school day rights Age of majority at 18: When students sign their own IEPs Transportation as more than just a bus ride Parent rights: Audio vs. video recording IEP meetings When parents don't cooperate: Reimbursement denials 💡 KEY TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Introduction: NASET's First Education Landscape Briefing 1:15 - What IDEA Mandates: FAPE in the Least Restrictive Environment 2:30 - Timothy W. Case: Zero-Reject Principle 4:45 - Rowley Case: Defining "Appropriate" Education 6:20 - Amy Rowley's Story: Was She the Right Plaintiff? 8:00 - Endrew F.: Moving Beyond Trivial Progress 10:15 - Age 21 Eligibility: When Does Special Ed End? 12:30 - GED vs. Standard Diploma: State Variations 14:00 - Dual Enrollment and College Credit Programs 15:20 - Extended School Day Case: Meeting Unique Needs 17:00 - Age of Majority at 18: Student Rights and Attorney Fees 19:00 - Transportation Requirements Beyond Bus Rides 20:45 - Recording IEP Meetings: Audio Yes, Video No 22:30 - Parent Non-Cooperation: When Reimbursement Is Denied 📚 ABOUT THIS SERIES: This is the first in NASET's Education Landscape Briefing series, designed to keep special education professionals informed about the legal frameworks that protect students with disabilities. Our expert presenters, Dr. Osborne and Dr. Russo, are leading authorities on special education law. 🎓 WHY THIS MATTERS: Understanding these cases helps you: Write legally defensible IEPs Advocate effectively for your students Navigate due process procedures Know when districts must provide services beyond standard programming Understand parent rights and responsibilities 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for legal updates, IEP training, and professional development 👍 LIKE if you learned something that will change your practice 💬 COMMENT: Which case surprised you most? #SpecialEducation #IDEA #SpecialEdLaw #IEP #FAPE #RowleyCase #EndrewF #EducationLaw #SPEDTeacher #SpecialEducationTeacher #NASET #DisabilityRights #DueProcess #TeacherTraining #EducationCompliance DISCLAIMER: This video provides educational information about special education law. It is not legal advice. Always consult with your district's legal counsel and follow local policies when implementing IEPs and addressing compliance issues.