Maintenance l Section 144 BNSS l Section 125 CrPC l Dr. Jinesh Soni l 2025 скачать в хорошем качестве

Maintenance l Section 144 BNSS l Section 125 CrPC l Dr. Jinesh Soni l 2025

In this video, I have discussed the latest judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court concerning Maintenance in which it had been observed that - 39. Before going into the details of the financial position of the parties, it is imperative that we highlight the position of law with regard to the determination of permanent alimony. This Court, in the cases of Rajnesh v. Neha, Kiran Jyot Maini (supra), and Parvin Kumar Jain v. Anju Jain15, provided a comprehensive criterion and a list of factors to be looked into while deciding the question of permanent alimony, which are as follows:- i. Status of the parties, social and financial. ii. Reasonable needs of the wife and the dependent children. iii. Parties’ individual qualifications and employment statuses. iv. Independent income or assets owned by the party. v. Standard of life enjoyed by the wife in the matrimonial home. vi. Any employment sacrifices made for family responsibilities. vii. Reasonable litigation costs for a non-working wife. viii. Financial capacity of the husband, his income, maintenance obligations, and liabilities. 40. In the present case, it is a matter of record and an admitted fact that the respondent is currently employed as a Research Specialist at PwC in Kolkata, earning a salary of Rs. 50,000 per month. In her reply affidavit, the respondent averred that the appellant earned Rs. 8 lakh per month in 2018 and claimed that he would now be earning more than Rs. 10 lakh per month. The appellant, in his rejoinder affidavit, admitted that while he was earning Rs. 8 lakh per month in 2018, however, at present, he is unemployed and is facing challenges in securing employment in India due to multiple cases filed by the respondent. Dr. Jinesh Soni Advocate 9772946899