1 दिन में प्रॉपर्टी से कब्ज़ा हटाए Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court on Adverse possession скачать в хорошем качестве

1 दिन में प्रॉपर्टी से कब्ज़ा हटाए Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court on Adverse possession

1 दिन में प्रॉपर्टी से कब्ज़ा हटाए Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court on Adverse possession 🖇️ Judgement link- https://indiankanoon.org/doc/56103097/ 1 दिन में प्रॉपर्टी से कब्ज़ा हटाए Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court on Adverse possession in Hindi In this video, Adv Papia discussed the landmark judgment by the Supreme court of India namely Poona Ram vs Moti Ram (D) Th. Lrs. on 29 January 2019. In this judgment, the court has clearly said that- If someone has occupied your house or land, then you can get it vacated without going to court. In Poona Ram vs Moti Ram case, the Supreme Court said that if you have the title of the property, you can vacate the property by force even after 12 years. There is no need to file a case in court for this. And if you do not have the title of the property and it has been 12 years since the possession, then you will have to file a case in court. The Specific Relief Act 1963 has been made for the legal proceedings of such cases. According to Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act, if a property is in your name i.e. the title of that property is with you and someone has illegally occupied that property, then a case can be filed under the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) to vacate it. The Supreme Court rejected has passed the judgment and said that this law is applicable in those cases, no one is the owner of the land, but if the land is owned by someone and has the title of that land, then it can be forcefully vacated even after 12 years. In India the concept of Adverse Possession mean that a trespasser or a stranger who comes into possession of the land must be in exclusive and continuous possession and without interruption for a certain period of time typically 12 to 30 consecutive years depending upon the classification of ownership (i.e, Private or ... 1 दिन में प्रॉपर्टी से कब्ज़ा हटाए Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court on Adverse possession in Hindi Time Stamp: 1:46- Intro 4:11- Poona Ram vs Moti Ram (D) Th. Lrs. 4:25- Adverse possession & questions before Supreme Court of India 6:58- Decision of Supreme Court & Adverse possession 7:57- Golden Tips 8:18- Outro My favorite books: 📚Criminal Procedure (latest 2023): https://amzn.to/3yx1wAi 📒Civil Procedure (CPC) (Edition 2023): https://amzn.to/3ZUoHRr 📕The Law Of Evidence: https://amzn.to/3LaUlp7 ________________________________________________________ Let's Connect on social media: 📱Instagram:   / papiiiaaa   🐦Twitter: www.twitter.com/decode_law ☹️📖 Facebook:   / decodethelaw   🔭Telegram: https://t.me/DecodeTheLaw_Official _____________________________________________________________________ 🟨 Related videos:- Section 498a ipc-    • FALSE CASE अब से मेंटेनेंस नहीं मिलेगा । प...      • पति के पक्ष में FALSE 498A Case Big Judgme...      • पति Maintenance से कैसे बचे | 498A case पत...      • सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने जारी किए दिशानिर्देश | Yo...   Landmark Judgement:-    • The END 498A ❌ | Landmark Judgement Suprem...      • Landmark Judgement of Supreme Court on Div...      • 125 The END ❌ खत्म! | 125 MAINTENANCE se k...      • 498A IPC Landmark Judgement Supreme Court ...   Property Law-    • Never Invest in Property before checking 1...   Labour Law-    • How Much Earn Mesothelioma Lawyer | Mesoth...   Related videos link-    • The Judgment of Supreme Court - Decode The...   ______________________________________________________ 🟨 DISCLAIMER 1. The content in this channel is strictly for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to be legal advice or recommendation of any kind whatsoever. Viewers should always take their own due diligence and own accord on any information perceived from this video to form their own opinion & best judgment. 2. The materials contained in this video can't replace a substitute for the services of trained professionals in any field including but not limited to financial, legal, or psychological matters. The video is not warranted for content accuracy or any other implied or explicit purposes. 3. This video is not intended to spread rumours or offend or hurt the sentiments of any religion, community, or individuals or to bring disrespect to any person living or dead whatsoever. 4. Some content may have been used as "fair use" for the purpose such as criticism, comment, teaching, scholarship & research, etc. under section 107 of the Copyright Act, 1976. Fair use of content is permitted by the copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. All credit for Copyright materials used herein goes to the respected owners if any and I do not have any claim on it whatsoever.  if there, is unintentional and deeply regretted. #adversepossession #supremecourt #decodethelaw #property #specificreliefact #advocate #law #legal #civil #femalelawyer #exclusive #mandatory #latest #kanoon