Target Levels of Risk & Safety (SFAIRP vs ALARP Revisited) | Risk! Engineers Talk Governance Podcast скачать в хорошем качестве

Target Levels of Risk & Safety (SFAIRP vs ALARP Revisited) | Risk! Engineers Talk Governance Podcast

In this episode, of Risk! Engineers Talk Governance, due diligence engineers Richard Robinson and Gaye Francis revisit the distinction between SFAIRP (So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable) and Target Levels of Risk and Safety. They explain how target levels of risk continue to be problematic in engineering despite being legally unsupportable under WHS/OHS legislation and share examples of regulators and engineers still using outdated approaches and discuss why this confusion persists, pointing to issues with Standards and educational institutions that continue teaching these methods. They clarify that SFAIRP asks "Are all reasonable practical precautions in place?" while target based approaches rely solely on calculated risk levels. Through real-world examples including expert witness cases and engineering consultations, they demonstrate how the SFAIRP approach leads to better safety outcomes and alignment between stakeholders and warn engineers and organisations still using target levels of risk for safety issues. This conversation follows their original discussion in Season 1 Episode 1: SFAIRP vs ALARP. While the table they refer to is available in their Criminal Manslaughter – How Not To Do It booklet, available online at https://www.r2a.com.au/store/p/r2a-cr... Richard and Gaye also run public and in-house workshops on the topic. For further information on Richard and Gaye’s consulting work with R2A, head to https://www.r2a.com.au. Gaye is also founder of women’s safety workwear company Apto PPE if you’d like to check out the garments at https://www.aptoppe.com.au