• ClipSaver
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious скачать в хорошем качестве

Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious 7 месяцев назад

скачать видео

скачать mp3

скачать mp4

поделиться

телефон с камерой

телефон с видео

бесплатно

загрузить,

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Minority Rights Are Part of Basic Structure, Most Minority Institutions Are Linguistic—Not Religious

Minority rights are part of the basic structure of the constitution and cannot be tampered with: Faizan Mustafa, Vice-Chancellor, Chanakya National Law University, and Professor of Law at AMU, to Karan Thapar for The Wire. .......................................... In a forceful and detailed articulation of minority rights, one of India’s foremost legal scholars has said “minority rights are part of the basic structure of the constitution”, adding “they cannot be tampered with”. Prof. Faizan Mustafa, the Vice-Chancellor of Chanakya National Law University and a Professor of Law at Aligarh Muslim University, said that the Supreme Court of India in the 1974 St. Xavier judgement had said that minority rights are part of the basic structure of the constitution and cannot be tampered with “as long as the constitution survives”. He said, in fact, the earlier 1973 Kesavananda Bharati judgement has specifically laid down that minority rights are part of the basic structure. In a 35-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, Prof. Mustafa made clear that any claim to the contrary is not just unfounded, false and wrong but tendentious, misleading and malicious. In the interview, Prof. Mustafa made clear that minority rights cover not just religious minorities but also linguistic minorities adding, very importantly, that the majority of minority institutions are linguistic in character rather than religious. He also made clear that Tamil speakers in UP or Urdu speakers in Karnataka and Telangana are deemed minorities and have a right to establish minority educational institutions. Similarly, Hindus in Kashmir, Punjab and parts of the North East are also minorities. This is because, as the Supreme Court has clarified, minorities are not determined at the national level but at the state level. Prof. Mustafa also explains the reason why minority rights were included in the constitution by Dr. Ambedkar and the constitution makers. This is because they are additional to individual rights of equality and the right not to be discriminated against. These are group rights. He adds that international law has well-established the concept of minority group rights for nearly one and a half centuries. They occur in the Swiss constitution of 1874 as well as the Austrian and Hungarian constitutions of the ’60s. It’s not a concept that was devised for the first time in India by our constitution makers. In the interview, Prof. Mustafa strenuously and strongly counters the view of proponents of Hindutva that minority rights are a form of appeasement. He also very effectively counters the view expressed by the Prime Minister on Saturday that “the constitution does not have any place for the Waqf Act” and repeated on Sunday when Piyush Goyal claimed that the Waqf Act is unconstitutional and appeasement. I will not go into details because I think you should see the interview for yourself. Prof. Mustafa’s arguments are detailed, cogent, convincing and very effectively delivered. I do not want to steal his thunder and, additionally, run the risk of précising or paraphrasing him wrongly. If the subject of minority rights interests you or if you are unclear what they are and their constitutional basis I strongly suggest you see this interview. To help you I give below the list of questions asked. Here they are: 1) The recent Aligarh Muslim University judgement has once again created both interest and controversy in the issue of minority rights. So let me start with a couple of general questions. First of all, am I right in saying the term minority covers both religious minorities as well as linguistic minorities? So we are not just talking about Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists we are also talking about Hindus in Kashmir, Punjab and the North East as well as linguistic minorities such as Tamil speakers in UP or Urdu speakers in Karnataka. Is that right? 2) Second, why did the constitution makers believe that we needed minority rights? 3) Third, so are you saying to me that the right to equality and the right not to be discriminated against, which are key parts of our constitution, are not sufficient to safeguard the interest of minorities? 4) Now over the last 75 years that the constitution has been in existence, how have minority rights been interpreted by the Courts? Is there a clear line of logic and interpretation that runs through it or has it differed from case to case? Join The Wire's Youtube Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month.    / @thewirenews  

Comments

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5