Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni: The Legal Loopholes That Could Save His Claims скачать в хорошем качестве

Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni: The Legal Loopholes That Could Save His Claims

https://linktr.ee/thetiltedlawyer Become part of the Tilted Lawyer Family be becoming a member:    / @thetiltedlawyer   Join us on Discord:   / discord   Follow me on Instagram: https://tr.ee/nkdtAxvHNe Follow me on TikTok: https://tr.ee/q8zb86D6X9 Sign up for Patreon for unpublished episodes: https://tr.ee/rGhjcHgA9H Blake Lively has filed her 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, and so many of you have acked me about CCP 47.1; it's not as bad as you think, In my opinion, she's still effed....here's why. Today I break down the most critical legal development yet in the high-profile legal war between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. Lively has filed a powerful motion to dismiss Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit, invoking protections under California Civil Code § 47.1, the litigation privilege, and the First Amendment. Her legal team argues that her statements about sexual harassment on the set of It Ends With Us are protected speech, and that Baldoni has failed to plead malice or any unlawful conduct that would justify keeping the case alive. Key Topics Covered in This Episode: ✅ What Blake Lively’s motion to dismiss actually says—and what it leaves out. ✅ Whether Baldoni has sufficiently pled malice, falsity, and damages. ✅ Can Lively’s speech be shielded under Cal. Civ. Code § 47.1? ✅ The legal standards for defamation, extortion, and interference claims. ✅ How Baldoni’s legal team may respond—and where the case could still gain traction.