У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Kerry Roberts CAUGHT AGAIN IN HER BIGGEST LIE YET by ALAN JACKSON in Karen Read's TRIAL PERJURY. или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Kerry Roberts Cross Examination Reveals lies, deception and possible perjury. Will Kerry Roberts be the first to do a deal with the FBI to avoid possible conspiracy and other criminal charges relating to John O'Keefe. Commonwealth v. Karen Read. Alan Jackson cross examination. FORENSIC ANALYSIS of Kerry Roberts' continued cross-examination reveals systematic narrative coordination with Jennifer McCabe, collaborative memory construction, and conscious information management. ⚖️ THE CASE: Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Karen Read - Defense attorney Alan Jackson continues cross-examination of prosecution witness Kerry Roberts, exposing patterns of witness coordination, timeline manipulation, and strategic testimony management. 🎯 CRITICAL FINDINGS: THE "FOUR TIMES" MINIMIZATION LIE: Roberts claims Jennifer McCabe asked her to contact DA's office "maybe like four" times. Triple minimization pattern ("not very many" + "maybe like" + "not many") contradicts documented evidence showing constant coordination at every testimony phase. Pattern highly consistent with conscious deception about actual frequency. THE IMPOSSIBLE FORGOTTEN WORDS: Karen Read's alleged first words at 5:00 AM: "He's dead" then immediate hangup. Roberts admits NOT mentioning this in Jan 29 interview hours after incident. Claims "did not remember that until a couple days later." Forensic analysis: probability of genuinely forgetting maximally dramatic first words at crisis opening is extremely low. Either/Or Analysis proves conscious narrative control regardless of whether statement true or false. COLLABORATIVE MEMORY CONSTRUCTION - DOCUMENTED: February 1, 2022 at Jennifer McCabe's house (12 Country Lane): Roberts and McCabe creating timeline together. Sister Denise McCabe scribing their joint "memories." Roberts admits: "She would say something, then you would say something, then it would spark something." Memory is "not completely independent" but a "combination" of both their memories. Written timeline created BEFORE second interview with law enforcement. SYSTEMATIC COORDINATION TIMELINE: January 29, 2022: Texting McCabe during state police interview (denied, then proven by evidence) February 1, 2022: At McCabe's house creating coordinated timeline with sister scribing February 1, 2022: Both interviewed at same location (12 Country Lane) February 1, 2022: Trooper Proctor already on phone with McCabe, Roberts inserts into active channel February 2, 2022: Together when both hand phones to police, sign consent forms together April 26, 2022: McCabe in anteroom before grand jury testimony Trial Day: McCabe calls "to wish good luck" - claims didn't discuss testimony DISTANCE LANGUAGE ANALYSIS: "I was in her house. I was not with her." Creates false linguistic separation from obvious coordination. Physical reality: at McCabe's house, creating timeline with McCabe, sister scribing. Linguistic claim: "not with her." Pattern indicates consciousness of problematic coordination. THE SHOCK DEFENSE: Unprompted justification: "But I believe I was in shock" to explain convenient omissions. Yet shock didn't affect memory of: injury details, timeline sequence, people present, CPR procedures. Selective deployment of trauma excuse for strategic memory gaps only. TEXT MESSAGE DENIAL PATTERN: Double "wouldn't" emphatic denial about texting during interview. Shown documentary evidence of texts with McCabe. Response: Still says "No" three times. Evidence fails to "refresh" memory. Pattern suggests consciousness that acknowledgment would reveal coordination content. THE PROCTOR CHANNEL: Lead investigator Trooper Proctor already on phone with Jennifer McCabe when Roberts asks to speak to him. Reveals McCabe's direct access to investigation. Roberts didn't initiate contact - inserted into ongoing McCabe-Proctor communication. TRIAL MORNING "GOOD LUCK" CALL: Admits speaking to McCabe morning of testimony. Claims they didn't discuss testimony. "She called to wish me good luck today." 📊 CONSCIOUS NARRATIVE CONTROL - FORENSIC ANALYSIS: Two-scenario analysis of "He's dead" statement proves conscious information management independent of underlying truth: Scenario A (if true): Strategic omission Jan 29, later deployment when narrative could safely contain it Scenario B (if false): Fabrication during Feb 1 coordination session Either scenario demonstrates conscious control of information flow, strategic timing of disclosure, and awareness of implications. ⚠️ DISCLAIMER: Forensic analysis for educational purposes. All testimony excerpts verbatim from court proceedings. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #ForensicLinguistics #JenniferMcCabe #WitnessAnalysis #AlanJackson #StatementAnalysis #TrueCrime #CourtAnalysis