OpenClaw vs Microsoft Copilot: Which AI Agent Is Safer? скачать в хорошем качестве

OpenClaw vs Microsoft Copilot: Which AI Agent Is Safer?

AI agents are not all the same — and OpenClaw is fundamentally different from Microsoft Copilot. In this video, we break down the architectural differences between cloud-based AI agents like Copilot and self-hosted AI infrastructure like OpenClaw. If you're concerned about privacy, security, or running your own AI automation platform, this deep dive explains what actually matters. Microsoft Copilot operates inside the Microsoft ecosystem, relying heavily on cloud infrastructure and enterprise integrations. OpenClaw, on the other hand, can be self-hosted, segmented, containerized, and connected to either local LLMs or external APIs — giving you full control over data flow and network access. We explain why privacy is not the problem with OpenClaw — misconfiguration is. You'll learn how to properly isolate your AI agent using virtual machines, Docker containers, firewalls, VPN access, authentication, and least-privilege principles. We also discuss real-world use cases where self-hosted AI infrastructure can outperform Copilot in flexibility and automation capability. If you're deciding between convenience and control, this video helps you understand the trade-offs clearly. Whether you're a developer, privacy enthusiast, homelab builder, or just curious about the future of AI agents in 2026, this breakdown gives you the concepts you need to choose wisely. ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 – AI Agents Are NOT the Same 02:40 – Copilot vs OpenClaw Architecture 05:30 – Privacy Myths Explained 08:00 – Secure Self-Hosting Setup 10:20 – Why Infrastructure Matters 🔔 SUBSCRIBE For AI infrastructure breakdowns, Linux guides, privacy-focused tech, and deep operating system analysis, subscribe to LinuxLift and turn on notifications. #OpenClaw #MicrosoftCopilot #AIAgents #SelfHostedAI #PrivacyTech #AI2026