Electricity Market Design: TRUE or FALSE | Contracts For Difference скачать в хорошем качестве

Electricity Market Design: TRUE or FALSE | Contracts For Difference

Fabien Roques and Cesar Matinez, Chair of Eurelectric working group on Wholesale Market Design & Investment Frameworks, engage in a TRUE or FALSE game on Contracts for Differences (CfDs) In the flagship study “Electricity market design, Fit for Net Zero”, Eurelectric and Compass Lexecon defined high-level recommendations on CfDs and other types of long-term contracts, stressing that guidance for the design of public de-risking schemes should be developed on best practices. The recent reform of the electricity market design puts forward two-sided CfDs (and equivalent schemes) as the single support mechanism for direct price support to new capacity. However, the reform leaves a range of design issues open. Against this backdrop, Eurelectric and Compass Lexecon released a new study, ‘Unlocking the power of CfDs to accelerate the energy transition’, which: –Highlights key challenges and trade-offs associated with design and implementation of two-way CfDs for RES and low-carbon technologies –Includes a range of alternatives addressing these key challenges –Provides guidance on best practices to design an efficient CfD Download the executive summary: https://cdn.eurelectric.org/media/698.... Subscribe to our newsletter: https://www.eurelectric.org/newslette... LinkedIn:   / eurelectric   Twitter:   / eurelectric   Timestamps: 00:00 Intro. 00:08 We have what we need to invest massively in electricity and decarbonise. 01:08 Two-sided CfDs are the silver bullet to derisk investments. 01:47 The design of CFDs matters to de-risk investment. 03:22 Further guidance on CFD design from the European Commission is needed 04:10 We need trade-offs in the design of CFDs #ElectricityMarketDesign #EMD #electricity