У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно STRUCTURAL MARXISM | PART 1 | INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS | POLITICAL SCIENCE | LEC 10 | UGC NET PAPER 2 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
STRUCTURAL MARXISM | PART 1 | INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS | POLITICAL SCIENCE | LEC 8 | UGC NET PAPER 2 Structural Marxism is an approach to Marxist philosophy based on structuralism, primarily associated with the work of the French philosopher Louis Althusser and his students. It was influential in France during the 1960s and 1970s, and also came to influence philosophers, political theorists and sociologists outside France during the 1970s. Other proponents of structural Marxism were the sociologist Nicos Poulantzas and the anthropologist Maurice Godelier. Many of Althusser's students broke with structural Marxism in the late 1960s and 1970s. Overview Structural Marxism arose in opposition to the instrumental Marxism that dominated many western universities during the 1970s.[citation needed] In contrast to other forms of Marxism, Althusser stressed that Marxism was a science that examined objective structures, and he believed that historicist and phenomenological Marxism, which was based on Marx's early works, was caught in a "pre-scientific ideology". Toward the middle of the 1970s and throughout the 1980s, Marxist theorists began to develop structuralist Marxist accounts of the state, law, and crime. Structuralist Marxism disputes the instrumentalist view that the state can be viewed as the direct servant of the capitalist or ruling class. Whereas the instrumentalist position is that the institutions of the state[5] are under the direct control of those members of the capitalist class in positions of state power, the structuralist position is that state institutions must function so as to ensure the viability of capitalism more generally. In other words, state institutions must reproduce capitalist society as a whole. The debate between structural and instrumental Marxists was characterized by the Miliband–Poulantzas debate between instrumentalist Ralph Miliband and structuralist Nicos Poulantzas. Structuralists view the state in a capitalist mode of production as taking a specifically capitalist form, not because particular individuals are in powerful positions, but because the state reproduces the logic of capitalist structure in its economic, legal, and political institutions. Hence, from a structuralist perspective one would argue that state institutions (including legal ones) function in the long-term interests of capital and capitalism, rather than in the short-term interests of members of the capitalist class. Thus the state and its institutions have a certain degree of independence from specific elites in the ruling or capitalist class. Website link.: https://swamivivekanandinstitute.com/ Facebook link.: / swamivivekanandinstitute1 Instagram Link.: / swami_vivekanandinstitute Registration Start for New Batch...... Hurry UP!!!!! We offer top-notch facilities for education:- *Highest Results in CSE 2022 *Genuine Students Review *Top Courses To Crack IAS Classes *Online | Offline Classes *Doubt Solving Session *Mock Test Series *Available PDF Notes *Recorded Classes Contact Us for more Details Phone No.- 9315200364 Address - C-105,Site-4, Budhela Vikaspuri, New Delhi 110018 #marxism #structuralmarxism #internationalrelations #liberalism #politicalscience #ugcnet2023preparation #ugcnet #preparation #ugcnetprepration #ugcnet2022examdate #ugcnet