Mom Expresses Frustration with the Way She Was Treated by the Child Support Office скачать в хорошем качестве

Mom Expresses Frustration with the Way She Was Treated by the Child Support Office

The discussion in this section revolves around a legal case involving child support payments. The individual admits that payments started coming in around 2020, coinciding with the pandemic. The questioning focuses on the consistency of payments from May 2020 to August 2021, with the individual stating that payments were not consistent due to wage garnishment. The individual emphasizes that they have always been there for their children and feels that the questioning is implying they are neglecting their responsibilities, which they vehemently deny. The speaker, Mom is discussing issues related to child support payments and possession credits in a court case. They express frustration with the way they are being treated by the child support office and emphasize that they have not neglected their children. The speaker mentions that their son has been living with them for several years and expresses financial difficulties leading to homelessness. The speaker's son turned 18 and did not graduate from high school, prompting questions about his living arrangements. The speaker explains that their son lived with them for almost three years before moving to live with their parents. The speaker also mentions giving money to their mother for their son's expenses. The speaker expresses frustration with the process and emphasizes their willingness to provide evidence. The speaker mentions giving their mother around $3,000 per year for Aiden's needs, particularly for school uniforms. They also state that they provided for Aiden's daily needs for the three years he lived with them. The speaker emphasizes their gratitude for being able to care for Aiden but also expresses financial struggles, mentioning being homeless and unable to afford having their paycheck garnished for child support. The court is trying to determine the exact amount the speaker provided to their mother for Aiden's expenses. The speaker estimates giving their mother between $3,000 to $5,000 per year for six years, totaling around $4,000 as an average amount per year. They clarify that Aiden lived with them for two years and seven months and provide documentation to support their claim. The court seeks to verify the details of the financial support provided to determine the speaker's legal obligations regarding child support. The individual, Mom expresses feeling like the conversation is condescending and but the Judge offers to get another judge if needed to make them feel comfortable. Despite the tone, they decide to proceed with the hearing after waiting for two and a half years. The conversation then shifts to discussing the amount of time the child lived with them and the financial support provided, including groceries and school uniforms. The individual struggles to provide evidence due to missing receipts. The financial statement is clarified, and the judge questions if there should be a credit subtracted from the balance based on the support provided. The individual argues that their child support payments are excessive considering their current income compared to when the payments were first calculated. The judge explains that based on the calculations, the individual may still be in arrears despite the time the child lived with them. The court also explained that future withholdings would cease since Miss Elizondo did not owe any more child support in this case.    • Mom doesn`t want to pay money for a child ...   Mom doesn`t want to pay money for a child that her baby Father does not give her and claims bias