Can we disagree without being triggered? скачать в хорошем качестве

Can we disagree without being triggered?

Dr. F. David Peat on Bohmian Dialogue By Dialogue they mean in a sense Bohmian Dialogue and in Bohmian dialogue you have a group of people, it might be 20 or 30, I don't remember the exact number and you meet in a circle together and you meet very regularly and so as Bohm said at the start of the dialogue people are polite to each other, but then as dialogue continues they have a level of trust and and and sort of fraction to like a bit of anger can happen or annoyance and Bohm was very happy when he saw that he would say the dialogue is working and one of the things he said about dialogue was that people have fixed non-negotiable positions. So for example, person over here may say abortion is wrong. It's morally wrong. It's taking a life. A person over here say abortion, it's a woman's choice. So these two people are friends. What they can do is they can agree with, never ever touch on the topic of abortion because if we do, it's gonna be devastating. We'll have a fight and we'll split up. But Bohm's idea was in a dialogue group there will always be people that take intermediate positions. So if somebody says something like the word abortion and that, and he would say that will cause in a person a lot of physical symptoms like distress, anger, fast breathing, the heart's beating fast, but there'll be people in the room who don't really aren't aligned either pro or con, and so they can, they can help slow this process down. So his idea was, if you can slow this down, you begin to realize how these positions are structured in your physical body, not just in your mind and your thoughts, but in your physical body. And it will help it's a way of helping you overcome that. So it's not that you're going to change your position, but you're going to change the, um, the physical reactions to it so you can be more open to discussion. From Absurdity of Certainty Documentary due 2019