У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно US vs Iran: The Math That Loses the War (THAAD Destroyed) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Forget the headlines. Forget the press conferences. There is one number that dictates the future of the conflict in the Persian Gulf, and the Pentagon isn’t saying it out loud: 650. In this episode of Arsenal Economics, we break down the catastrophic failure of the US missile defense architecture in the Middle East. We analyze the 3-step "kill chain" Iran executed to blind American radar systems and destroy a THAAD battery—a system worth over $1 billion. We are witnessing a lethal mismatch in military economics. While the US relies on interceptors that cost $12 million each and take years to replace, adversaries are swarming defenses with $35,000 drones. The math doesn't add up, and the stockpiles are running empty. In this video, we cover: 🚀 The Kill Chain: How Iran dismantled the AN/FPS-132 and AN/TPY-2 radars before hitting the THAAD battery. 📉 The Stockpile Crisis: Why the US only has roughly 650 THAAD interceptors worldwide. 💸 The Invoice System: How cheap Shahed-136 drones are forcing the US to bankrupt its own ammo reserves. 🇨🇳 The China Factor: How the depletion in the Gulf is destroying deterrence in the Pacific. 📊 Heritage Foundation Data: The terrifying reality of US interceptor burn rates in a high-intensity conflict. This is the reality of modern warfare that mainstream media is missing. The timelines for production do not match the timeline of the war. #ArsenalEconomics #Geopolitics #MissileDefense #Iran #USMilitary #THAAD #ModernWarfare Disclaimer: This video is for educational and analytical purposes only. The scenarios, damage assessments, and strategic breakdowns discussed are based on publicly available data, open-source intelligence, and procurement reports (such as those from the Heritage Foundation and manufacturer annual reports). This content is intended to analyze the economic and logistical constraints of modern military conflict and does not promote violence or endorse any specific political agenda. All military figures and cost estimates are approximate based on current fiscal year reporting.