第九週 - 2｜于有慧｜合作社：原來公司可以長這樣？｜政大《去成長》講座型通識課 скачать в хорошем качестве

第九週 - 2｜于有慧｜合作社：原來公司可以長這樣？｜政大《去成長》講座型通識課

第九週 - 2｜于有慧｜合作社：原來公司可以長這樣？｜政大《去成長》講座型通識課 Week 09 - 2｜Yo Huei Yu｜Cooperatives: Rethinking What a Company Can Be｜Degrowth, An Interdisciplinary General Education Course at NCCU 本課程為講座型通識課，由多位講師共同講授。課程圍繞「去成長」（degrowth）的概念及實踐進行。 「去成長」或「棄成長」、「後成長」、「福祉經濟」等類似名詞都在傳遞同一訊息：無止境的經濟成長正在毀滅地球生態、扼殺我們的未來、創造更嚴重的貧富不均、剝奪我們的幸福。如同阿米塔夫．戈什（Amitav Ghosh）在《大錯亂》（The Great Derangement）一書所言，「如果有任何一件事因為全球暖化而變得再清楚不過，那就是：繼續用現行方式思考理解這世界等於是在集體自殺。」 衡量經濟成長的工具—GDP—盲目堆疊商品及服務易手價格，渾然無視過程中對地球母親的千刀萬剮、普羅大眾持續遭受的剝削、以及分配持續惡化下越來越扭曲病態的社會結構。既然追求GDP帶來的是毀滅與痛苦，那麼拋開經濟成長枷鎖、以人民幸福快樂為目的的社會與經濟制度看起來會是什麼樣子呢？如果從土地使用、住房、飲食、耕作、照顧、教育、合作社、交易、能源、交通…我們都能夠自主、秉持善意重新規劃藍圖、逐步擺脫資本主義，未來世界或許仍舊美好可期。 This interdisciplinary general education course is designed in a lecture format and co-taught by multiple instructors. It centers around the concept and practices of degrowth, critically examining dominant assumptions about economic progress, development, and human flourishing. The terms degrowth, post-growth, de-growth economics, and wellbeing economy all converge on a shared message: perpetual economic growth is ecologically unsustainable, socially destructive, and ethically questionable. It accelerates ecological collapse, exacerbates inequality, and undermines collective wellbeing. As Amitav Ghosh writes in The Great Derangement, “[I]f there is one thing that global warming has made perfectly clear it is that to think about the world only as it is amounts to a formula for collective suicide.” Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the standard metric for economic growth, merely tallies monetary exchanges of goods and services, while remaining blind to the violent exploitation of ecosystems, the structural disenfranchisement of the majority, and the worsening inequality embedded in current capitalist societies. If growth driven by GDP leads us toward destruction, what might a society look like if it prioritized happiness and collective wellbeing instead? What if we could reimagine our systems of land use, housing, food production, care, education, energy, and mobility differently, as guided not by profit, but by solidarity, ecological regeneration, and autonomy from capitalism?