У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно How an Ottoman Sultan Strangled 19 Brothers in One Day—Then Killed His Own Son for Being Too Popular или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In January 1595, Mehmed III became Sultan of the Ottoman Empire. His first act as ruler was to order the execution of every potential rival to his throne. Nineteen brothers—some adults, some teenagers, some children, one still an infant—were strangled with silk bowstrings in a single day. Their bodies were laid out in the palace for inspection. This wasn't murder. This was law. The Ottoman "Law of Fratricide" explicitly stated that new sultans should kill their brothers "to ensure the order of the world." For over 150 years, this was official imperial policy. Mehmed III wasn't a monster—he was following the rules. And eight years later, he would follow those same rules when he strangled his own son, Prince Mahmud, for becoming too popular. This is the story of how political systems create incentives for mass murder. How succession laws turn family into existential threats. How rational governance can require killing children. And why the Ottoman Empire—one of history's most successful states—built fratricide into its legal code and called it wisdom. 🎯 KEY THEMES: Ottoman Empire succession and the Law of Fratricide Mehmed III's 1595 execution of 19 brothers Safiye Sultan's role as Queen Mother Prince Mahmud's execution by his own father How political systems incentivize violence Silk bowstring execution method Why the system finally ended under Ahmed I Institutional violence vs individual evil 📚 SOURCES & FURTHER READING: Primary Sources: Ottoman imperial edicts and succession laws Contemporary chronicles of Mehmed III's reign Foreign ambassador reports from 1595 Palace records from Topkapi Academic History: Leslie P. Peirce, "The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire" Caroline Finkel, "Osman's Dream: The History of the Ottoman Empire" Jason Goodwin, "Lords of the Horizons: A History of the Ottoman Empire" Baki Tezcan, "The Second Ottoman Empire" Studies on Ottoman succession and fratricide law On the Law of Fratricide: Mehmed II's 1478 legal codification Kanunname (Ottoman legal codes) Analysis of succession violence prevention Comparative succession systems On Specific Figures: Mehmed III (ruled 1595-1603) Safiye Sultan (Queen Mother/Valide Sultan) Prince Mahmud (executed son) Ahmed I (ended fratricide practice) 🎓 HISTORICAL CONTEXT: The Law of Fratricide (Kanun-i Katl): Formalized by Sultan Mehmed II (the Conqueror) in 1478. The law explicitly stated: "Whichever of my sons inherits the sultanate, it is proper for him to kill his brothers to ensure the order of the world. Most jurists have approved this. Let action be taken accordingly." This was official Ottoman imperial law for over 150 years (1478-1603). Why It Existed: Ottoman succession had no primogeniture (eldest doesn't automatically inherit) Any prince could theoretically claim the throne Previous civil wars had devastated the empire Solution: Eliminate all potential rivals immediately upon succession Prevents civil war by making competition impossible The Execution Method: Silk bowstrings used for strangulation Performed by mute executioners (tongues cut out for secrecy) No blood spilled (considered more respectful for royalty) Quick but not painless Bodies displayed for sultan's confirmation Mehmed III's 1595 Massacre: 19 brothers executed on succession day (some sources say 20) Ages ranged from infants to adults Youngest reportedly strangled in cradle All were sons of Sultan Murad III Some had factional support that made them genuine threats Prince Mahmud's Execution (1603): Mehmed III's eldest son Became too popular with military and court Seen as threat to father's rule Strangled on father's orders Official reason: plotting against sultan (possibly fabricated) The System's End: Ahmed I (ruled 1603-1617) kept his brothers alive Started "Kafes" (Cage) system - imprisoning princes instead Ended widespread fratricide practice But created new problems: princes raised in isolation sometimes became sultan Scale of Ottoman Fratricide: Hundreds of princes killed over 150+ years Mehmed III's 19 brothers: largest single-day fratricide Other notable mass executions by various sultans System finally abandoned in early 17th century 📱 CONNECT & SUPPORT: 🔔 Subscribe for more institutional horror deep-dives 👍 Like if this changed how you think about systems vs individuals 💬 Comment: Can preventing civil war justify fratricide? 🔗 Share with anyone studying political systems #OttomanEmpire #MehmedIII #Fratricide #OttomanHistory #TurkishHistory #RoyalMurder #Succession #PoliticalViolence #SafiyeSultan #TopkapiPalace #IslamicHistory #MedievalHistory #HistoricalHorror #InstitutionalViolence #LawOfFratricide #TurkishEmpire #ByzantineHistory #HistoryDocumentary #RoyalFamily #SuccessionWars @CinematicTalesofHistory