У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Truth About the Kronstadt Mutiny (1921) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In this video we delve into the 1921 Kronstadt sailor mutiny. --------------------------------- Script on my blog: https://mltheory.wordpress.com/2021/0... My patreon / thefinnishbolshevik My discord / discord --------------------------------- SOURCES: Paul Avrich, Kronstadt: The 1921 Uprizing of Sailors in the Context of the Political Development of the New Soviet State* White Guard Memorandum On Organizing An Uprising In Kronstadt, reprinted in Avrich Primary source documents printed in “Kronshtadtskaia tragediia 1921 goda, dokumenty v dvukh knigakh” (“Kronstadt Tragedy”): -Kuzmin Report, 25 March 1921 -Agranov Report, April 1921 -“To All Posts of Kronstadt,” Kronstadt Izvestia -Ivan Oreshin, Volia Rossii (April-May 1921) -Kronstadt March 1 Resolution -Tseidler, Red Cross Activity in Organizing Provisions Aid to Kronstadt, 25 April 1921. -Kupolov, "Kronstadt and the Russian Counterrevolutionaries in Finland: From the Notes of a Former Member of the PRC” -Komarov Report, 25 March 1921 -Von Lampe's Diary entry -Minutes of Cheka Interrogation of Anatoly Lamanov Kronstadt 1921: Bolshevism vs. Counterrevolution, Spartacist #6 Spring 2006 [Very good article, which brought many primary source documents to my attention. The article propagates erroneous Trotskyist views but luckily they have practically nothing to do with the topic of Kronstadt and can thus be ignored.] Macartney, Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919-1939 Russkaia voennaia emigratsiaa 20-x—40-x godov Radek, The Kronstadt Uprising, 1921 History of the USSR volume 3 http://ciml.250x.com/archive/ussr/eng... Stalin, Articles and Speeches, Moscow, 1934, Russ. ed., p. 217, quoted in History of the USSR vol. 3 Hufvudstadsbladet, March 8, quoted in “The Truth about Kronstadt” by Wright Kronstadt Izvestia, March 7 & 11, quoted in Wright Sotsialisticheski Vestnik April 5, 1921, quoted in Wright “Petrograd et Moscou Seraient aux Maine des Insurgés qui ont Formé un Gouvernement Provisoire.”, Matin, March 7, quoted in Wright “Der Aufstand in Russland.”, Vossische Zeitung, March 10, quoted in Wright The Mensheviks in the Kronstadt Mutiny," Krasnaill Letopis', 1931, No.2 Dernières Nouvelles de Paris, 8th March quoted in Radek Trotsky, More on the Suppression of Kronstadt History of the CPSU(B) short course https://www.marxists.org/reference/ar... Lenin, Once Again On The Trade Unions, The Current Situation and the Mistakes of Trotsky and Buhkarin https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... Lenin, The Trade Unions, The Present Situation And Trotsky’s Mistakes https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... Lenin, On the Kronstadt revolt https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... Lenin, Tenth Congress of the R.C.P.(B.) https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... Lenin, The All-Russia Congress Of Transport Workers https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... Lenin, Third Congress Of The Communist International https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... Lenin, The Tax in Kind https://www.marxists.org/archive/leni... *Avrich provides a lot of useful factual information, however he is pro-anarchist. He sees the Kronstadt mutiny as a tragedy which could never have succeeded but he sympathizes with it. Despite everything he tries to deny that the mutiny was orchestrated by the Whites. He admits that the Kronstadt mutineers collaborated with Whites, Monarchists, Capitalists, foreign powers, Mensheviks and SRs but basically claims “that doesn't matter”. His book is from 1970 when the archives were still closed. For that reason he relies quite heavily on dishonest Menshevik and Anarchist sources which have nothing to support their claims, and often he takes Petrichenko's words at face value. He also doesn't understand Marxism and therefore distorts it. Perhaps it was impossible to publish in American academia unless one reached an anti-bolshevik conclusion? Still he deserves credit for his discoveries.