У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Dome of the Rock: A Response to AJ Deus - 1 - Introduction или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
A.J. Deus' latest paper on the Dome of the Rock has caused some waves. In it, he argues for a young Dome of the Rock with a fake history. According to A.J., the inscriptions are late forgeries and the Dome in its current form has existed for less than 200 years. Given how extensive the article is, I had to take quite some time to look into A.J. Deus' claims. As it turns out, none of his claims hold up to scrutiny. A.J. is asking some legitimate questions, but his answers are not warranted. In this video, I will give a quick introduction into the claims made by A.J. Deus and we will look at an initial example for an error on A.J.'s part which showcases how he fails to correctly read his own sources, something that we will see again and again in later videos. #islam #domeoftherock #jerusalem #al-malik #al-mamun #dome #rock #safa #ajdeus #fraud #christianity #judaism #arab Music by Darren Curtis. ____________________ If you like my content and would like me to be able to continue producing more, you can support me in the following ways: Become a Patron and get access to some exclusive content: / thomasalexander Donate via PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_... Donate Bitcoin: 36AcDS46SGX23xSDQWJQi9C4xtGaqevGba Donate ETH or ERC20 Tokens: 0x466b19D59D0Ad527a27871001e18283fA6F3D2fd ____________________ Here you can find A.J. Deus' paper: https://www.academia.edu/69970087/THE...