My Response to Mike Israetel and Layne Norton скачать в хорошем качестве

My Response to Mike Israetel and Layne Norton

In this video, I deconstruct the fallout from my exposé on Mike Israetel’s doctoral thesis. Specifically, I offer a point-by-point refutation of the responses from Mike Israetel (‪@RenaissancePeriodization‬) himself and Layne Norton (‪@biolayne1‬) before contemplating the broader implications of these exchanges. Chapters: 0:00 Prologue 0:23 Chapter 1. Introduction 2:07 Chapter 2. An Overview of Mike Israetel’s response 2:23 2.1. A brief recap 4:17 2.2. Attacking the messenger 6:43 2.3. Minimizing the message 10:56 Chapter 3. My response to Mike Israetel 11:19 3.1. Refuting the attacks on the messenger 13:04 3.2. Refuting the defences of the thesis 13:17 3.2.1. The ‘⅓ PhD’ defence 15:18 3.2.2. The ‘clerical error’ defence 19:48 3.2.3. The ‘context’ defence 20:59 3.2.4. The ‘my thesis had merit’ defence 23:43 3.3. On Mike Israetel’s conception of ethics 28:12 3.4. On Mike Israetel’s ‘credentials are bull****’ reversal 29:52 3.5. On Mike Israetel’s glaring omission 31:10 Chapter 4. An Overview of Layne Norton’s response 32:19 Chapter 5. My response to Layne Norton 32:30 5.1. Ad hominem and gatekeeping 33:35 5.2. The critic vs the creator fallacy 34:39 5.3. The preemptive ‘hit piece’ 36:56 5.4. Criticism vs ‘cancellation’ 37:31 Chapter 6. Why this matters 39:22 Chapter 7. Conclusion Special thanks to the brilliant ‪@RenVasTerul‬ for granting me permission to use his excellent rendition of the Sardaukar Chant, linked here:    • Sardaukar Chant Throat Singing Cover (DUNE...   Online consultations: Email: solomonnelsonconsulting @ gmail . com Discord: solomonnelsonconsulting