How Disney Failed Kylo Ren скачать в хорошем качестве

How Disney Failed Kylo Ren

From Temple Archives to fan-forged theories, support the channel and help keep the archives open — become an Initiate of the Order now! :    / @inspiredtheories   Kylo Ren was never supposed to be just another Star Wars villain. From the moment he froze a blaster bolt midair, Kylo Ren was positioned as the emotional and thematic backbone of the sequel trilogy—a dark side Skywalker who chose evil instead of falling into it. That idea alone made him one of the most fascinating characters Star Wars had introduced in decades. And then… Disney lost control of him. Across three films, Kylo Ren is pulled in completely different directions by competing creative visions, reactionary storytelling, and corporate fear of fan backlash. What starts as a terrifying, intentional inversion of Darth Vader slowly unravels into confusion, contradiction, and ultimately, a redemption that feels rushed, unearned, and hollow. In The Force Awakens, Kylo Ren is framed as a monster hiding behind a human face. The mask isn’t protection—it’s a weapon. The reveal underneath doesn’t soften him; it makes him worse. By the time he murders Han Solo, Kylo has made a clear choice. He rejects redemption. He kills the light. He becomes something Star Wars had never fully explored before. A Skywalker who embraces the dark. The Last Jedi strips away the myth. Kylo is exposed, volatile, insecure—but still dangerous. When he kills Snoke and claims the throne, the trilogy finally seems ready to commit. This should have been the moment Kylo Ren became the galaxy’s primary antagonist—a ruler acting on his own will, not a puppet, not a victim. Instead, the film undercuts him. By the end, Kylo is no longer feared. He’s emotional. Reactive. Yelling at ghosts while the Resistance escapes. The power is there—but the framing is not. And what could have been a temporary stumble becomes permanent in the final film. The Rise of Skywalker doesn’t build on Kylo Ren’s arc—it reverses it. His agency is stripped away. His choices are rewritten. Palpatine returns, turning Kylo into just another manipulated pawn. The one thing that made him unique—choosing darkness—is erased. And then comes the redemption. A sudden turn. No consequences. No reckoning. No time spent wrestling with the weight of genocide, tyranny, or the destruction of the New Republic. Kylo Ren doesn’t atone. He doesn’t rule. He doesn’t live with his sins. He simply disappears. This video breaks down how and why Disney failed Kylo Ren, not because he returned to the light—but because they never decided what he was meant to represent. Monster. Tyrant. Tragic figure. Victim. The answer changes with every movie, and the character collapses under that inconsistency. Kylo Ren should have stayed Kylo Ren. Whether you loved or hated the sequels, his arc reveals the deeper problems at the heart of the trilogy—and why its most compelling character never reached his full potential. If you enjoy deep Star Wars character analysis, narrative breakdowns, and honest discussions about where things went wrong (and what could’ve been), you’re in the right place. Let me know your take— Do you agree Kylo Ren was wasted, or do you think his redemption worked? What direction would you have taken the character? Chapters: 0:00 - Intro 0:46 - The Force Awakens – A Monster With a Face 3:55 - The Last Jedi – Stripping Away the Myth 7:41 - The Rise of Skywalker – Undoing Instead of Building 9:53 - The Redemption That Shouldn’t Exist 13:18 - How Disney Truly Failed Kylo Ren Check out more Star Wars theories and alternate timelines: 👉    • Star Wars What If   All music credit: Pixabay.com Follow me for more updates and discussions: TikTok:   / revenge_of_the_psych   #StarWars #KyloRen #Sith #Jedi #StarWarsLore #StarWarsSequels #BenSolo #AdamDriver