У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно 0% Sportsmanship Moments или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Darts is meant to be a gentleman’s game — built on precision, respect, and sportsmanship. But when the pressure is highest, even the best players sometimes lose control completely. In this video, we break down the most shocking unsporting moments in professional darts history — from violent outbursts and physical confrontations to psychological warfare and mind games that crossed the line. You’ll see: Cameron Menzies’ shocking meltdown at the World Championship Adrian Lewis physically confronting an opponent Gerwyn Price’s infamous £21,500 fine Phil Taylor and Raymond van Barneveld’s on-stage clash Peter Wright vs Gerwyn Price’s bitter semi-final Justin Pipe’s controversial celebrations Luke Littler’s 147 moment that sparked outrage Mensur Suljovic’s slow-play controversy and Joe Cullen’s cheating accusation These moments aren’t just bad behavior — they expose the unwritten rules of darts, where etiquette, rhythm, and respect matter just as much as scoring power. Where is the line between: Passion and poor sportsmanship? Gamesmanship and cheating? Celebration and disrespect? Most darts matches end with a handshake and mutual respect. But when emotions boil over, darts becomes something else entirely — a drama played out on the biggest stages in the sport. 👉 Which moment crossed the line the most for you? RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a "fair use" of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states "Fair dealing" with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------