‘‘If It’s Possible, Let This Cup Pass’’ (Why Did God’s Plan Require His Son to Beg?) скачать в хорошем качестве

‘‘If It’s Possible, Let This Cup Pass’’ (Why Did God’s Plan Require His Son to Beg?)

Jesus commanded storms to stillness. Raised corpses. Told His followers with absolute certainty He'd die and rise on the third day. Then He was face-down in the dirt, sweating blood, begging: "If it is possible, let this cup pass from me." If it's possible. Jesus—who spoke galaxies into existence—is asking if something is possible. As if He doesn't know. As if there might be an alternative. His Father, who loved Him "before the foundation of the world," watched Him bleed from His pores and said nothing. No voice from heaven. No reassurance. Just silence. 🩸 WHAT HAPPENED IN GETHSEMANE: Luke (the physician) describes hematidrosis—extreme psychological stress rupturing capillaries near sweat glands, mixing blood with perspiration. It happens to people who know they're about to die. Jesus prays three times. Same prayer. Same silence. Then an angel appears—not to deliver Him, not to announce a change of plans, but to strengthen Him to go through with what cannot be avoided. The Father spoke from heaven at Jesus's baptism: "This is my beloved Son." He spoke at the transfiguration: "Listen to Him." But when His Son is bleeding from His pores, begging for alternatives, the Father stays silent. ❓ THE DISTURBING QUESTION: Was there another way? Jesus asked directly: "Is this possible?" *If He already knew the answer was no:* The prayer is theater. "Not my will but yours" becomes less profound because there was never an actual choice. *If He didn't know:* The Father deliberately withheld information that would have helped His Son in His suffering. Either way, the silence is disturbing. A son begging. A father with power to answer or intervene. The father chooses silence. ⚖️ WHY DOES GOD'S PLAN REQUIRE BLOOD? God is omnipotent. He spoke the universe into existence. So why can't He just... forgive? Why does someone have to die? Standard answer: Justice demands payment. Sin against an infinite being requires infinite sacrifice. *But think about what this means:* God designed the system where His own justice requires death. He set up the rules. He decided "without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness." Why make that rule? Human parents forgive children without requiring anyone to die. We forgive debts, betrayals, wrongs—without demanding blood payment. Are we more merciful than God? 🤔 WAS IT THE ONLY WAY? *Some theologians say yes:* Given sin's nature and justice's requirements, the cross was the only possible solution. Problem: If God is bound by rules He didn't create, where did those rules come from? Who enforces them? Is there something above God limiting His options? *Some say no:* God is omnipotent. He could have chosen any number of redemption paths. He could have forgiven by decree without requiring death. Problem: If there were other options and God chose the one involving maximum suffering, what does that reveal about divine priorities? 🔄 THE TRINITY PROBLEM: Jesus is God. The Father is God. They're two persons but one God. So in Gethsemane, God is begging God not to require God to suffer what God has planned for God. If Jesus's divine will was always aligned with the Father's plan, then His human will's resistance is... what? Performance? If Jesus's human will could genuinely differ from the Father's will, why does the Father's preference win? ⚖️ THE JUSTICE PROBLEM: Substitutionary atonement logic: Jesus (innocent) takes punishment. God's justice is satisfied by punishing the wrong person. Apply this to human justice: A judge says "You deserve prison, but this innocent man volunteered to serve your sentence instead. Justice is satisfied." We'd call that corruption—punishing an innocent person for a guilty person's crime. Yet this is the logic of the cross. 🎭 FOUR OPTIONS FOR WHAT THE FATHER WAS THINKING: *1. Emotionally detached:* Classical theology's impassible God—incapable of being moved or changed. He feels no pain watching His Son suffer because suffering would imply change. *2. Suffering too:* Modern evangelicalism's emotional God—grieving alongside us but committed to the plan because resurrection is coming. *3. Trapped by His own nature:* Would change the plan if He could, but can't. Justice demands satisfaction. Even the Father can't change what must happen. *4. Chose this way:* Multiple paths existed. The Father chose the one involving His Son's torture. Not because it was the only option, but because it was most effective. Each answer creates new problems. ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - "If It's Possible, Let This Cup Pass" 2:00 - Gethsemane: Three Prayers, Blood Sweat, Silence 4:00 - Why the Silence? 6:00 - Why Does God's Plan Require Blood? 8:00 - Was There Another Way? 10:00 - The Trinity Problem 12:00 - The Justice Problem 14:00 - What Was the Father Thinking? 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for questions with disturbing answers 💬 Was there another way God chose not to take? Does this trouble you? #Bible #Jesus #Gethsemane #Christianity #WWGT #Theology