У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно In Pursuit of Robust Failure Mode Effects Analysis | p2m Berlin & ManTech | Capella Days 2023 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In Pursuit of Robust Failure Mode Effects Analysis in the Design Phase Presented by Alice Cellamare from p2m Berlin and Steven Huang from ManTech. The slides presentation are available on the Capella website: https://mbse-capella.org/resources/pd... *** In the field of Systems Engineering, the anticipation of failures is of paramount importance, especially in the advanced stages of system design. In practice failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) is performed using a bottoms-up approach to be as thorough as possible at identifying and understanding system failure modes and their causes. Failure modes are typically prioritized according to how serious their consequences are, how frequently they occur, and how easily they can be detected. The objective of this work, which was carried out in the context of the INCOSE Mentoring Program, is to develop a methodology that harnesses all the information embedded within the system model, minimizing reliance on human conjectures. By utilizing the Python4Capella AddOn, a prototype script has been developed for Capella, aiming to automate parts of the analysis process and defining a set of potential failure modes which is as comprehensive as possible. Central to this exploration is the use of the concepts of Configuration and Situation, as implemented in the VPMS viewpoint AddOn. These notions offer potential for a more detailed understanding of failure effects, aiding safety analysts in priority scoring. This presentation will describe how we relate three different failure classes to failure effects by relying particularly on the information in Exchange Scenario diagrams and illustrate an example of implementing such an method using a common system model in Capella. *** Stay up to date on Capella news and events by following our socials here: Website: https://www.eclipse.org/capella/ LinkedIn : / capella-mbse-tool Capella Forum: https://forum.mbse-capella.org/ *** Chapters: 0:00 - Intro and outline 2:52 - Poll 1: In which industry do you work? 4:04 - Safety Assessment Methods 5:13 - Poll 2: Which of these do you use or see in your industry? 6:09 - What about completeness 7:03 - Known tools for Capella 8:40 - Poll 3: Which of these do you use? 9:35 - Project scope 12:23 - Poll 4: Do you think it is possible/appropriate to use this strategy to achieve a high degree of completeness in failure identification? If not, why? 14:48 - Relevant model elements 15:39 - The VMPS Viewpoint 17:00 - Project activities 18:02 - Failure types 19:20 - What do you think about this classification? 19:46 - Component failure analysis 20:52 - Analysis of affected elements 21:23 - Scenario breakdown 22:30 - Examples 31:20 - Poll 5: Can you see this working? 33:09 - Q&A: Can this tool also detect multi-functional chain failures? 35:43 - Q&A: How do you cover Software Failures? 37:39 - Q&A: Have you manage to validate analysis with a real component/system? 39:30 - Q&A: How do you expect it to scale when applied on large models?