Important Landmark Judgment of Supreme Court for Section 311 CRPC |Top | Best Law Channel on YOUTUBE скачать в хорошем качестве

Important Landmark Judgment of Supreme Court for Section 311 CRPC |Top | Best Law Channel on YOUTUBE

Important Landmark Judgment of Supreme Court for Section 311 CRPC | Top | Best Law Channel on YOUTUBE, Important Landmark Judgment of Supreme Court for Section 311 CRPC | SC Case Laws for Sec 311 Cr.PC Landmark Judgments Section 311 Cr.PC, Chandran v. State of Kerala, 1985 Cr.LJ 1288 (Ker) - Whether Section 311 Be Allowed In Case Where Evidence Of A Witness Was Initially Given Up By Prosecution But Later Recalled After Closure Of Defence Evidence ? , Whether Informant Be Recalled, Mukund Dev Baral v. Sanjib Baral, 1992 Cr.LJ 3048 (Ori), Where in a police initiated case, the trial Judge had refused to recall a witness, and the informant went in revision against the refusal order, it was held that the revision was maintainable even if the case was instituted by the police. The High Court accepted the prayer of recalling the witness, Whether Change Of Counsel Is A Ground Under Section 311 CR.PC ? , State (NCT of Delhi) v. Shiva Kumar Yadav, (2016) 2 SCC , Held – Mere change of counsel cannot be a ground to recall the witness , Recalling is Not Allowed to Fill Lacuna of Prosecution Case , Mannan SK. v. State of West Bengal, AIR 2014 SC 2950 , The words ‘essential to the just decision of the case’ are the key words. The Court should not permit the prosecution to fill-up the lacuna. It has been held that whether recall of a witness is for filling-up of a lacuna or it is for a just decision of a case depends on facts and circumstances of each cas, Section 311 Cr.PC is Not Limited Only to Benefit Accused, A witness was examined and cross-examined before a Magistrate. Subsequently, he gave inconsistent evidence before a Juvenile Court where one of the accused was being tried. An application was made before the Magistrate to re-summon him for cross examination about his statements in the Juvenile Court. , Hanuman Ram v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 2009 SC 69 , Palacharla Rama Rao Vs. State of AP. 2002 CrLJ 4189 A.P, Whether A Witness be Recalled on Suo Motu Re-opening of a Case , Best crpc lecture, crpc lecture series, crpc lectures, best law teacher in India, best law teacher on youtube, top law channel in india, best law channel on youtube, rakesh kapoor lectures crpc, crpc lectures rakesh kapoor, judicial competition times, judicialcompetitiontimes, judicialcompetitiontimes.in, judicialcompetitiontimes.com, sec 311 crpc,section 311 crpc,section 311 cr.pc,sec 311 cr.pc,sec 311 criminal procedure code,section 311 criminal procedure code,best lecture crpc,crpc best lecture,crpc lectures,free crpc lecture,crpc notes,crpc notes pdf,crpc,cr.pc,crpc lecture,crpc judgments for judiciary exams,crpc lectures for judicial exams,judicial exams,judiciary exams,judiciary coaching classes,supreme court landmark judgment for section 311 crpc,section 311 crpc case laws IMPORTANT LINKS OF OFFICIAL WEBSITE AND SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS YouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMaD... YouTube Handler - @judicialcompetitiontimes Official Website - https://judicialcompetitiontimes.in/ Facebook Page - https://judicialcompetitiontimes.in/ Link to register online coaching classes -https://judicialcompetitiontimes.in/A... Link to choose courses - https://judicialcompetitiontimes.in/C... --------------------------------- Hash Tags #judicialcompetitiontimes #delhijudicialservices #judiciarycoaching