Master manipulator & gullible boyfriend. Nathaniel Huey was Gullible & Ermalinda was a manipulator. скачать в хорошем качестве

Master manipulator & gullible boyfriend. Nathaniel Huey was Gullible & Ermalinda was a manipulator.

According to reports The investigation files reveal a Streamwood couple, Nathaniel Huey, Jr., 32, and his fiancée Ermalinda Palomo, 50, were behind the murders. Huey, Jr. thought he was carrying out a drug cartel hit, when in reality, Palomo was pulling the strings and manipulating him to put an end to his illicit romance. Misery and mystery marked an unfathomable murder case in September 2023. When responding to a welfare check, Romeoville police discovered the bodies of an entire family: Alberto Rolon, 32, Zoraida Bartolomei, 38, and their boys, nine-year-old Adriel and seven-year-old Diego, all shot to death along with the family dogs. ******** Support here: https://cash.app/$1deeboi9 Social Media:   / d_smith_lets_discuss     / deesmithletsdiscussllc   https://www.tiktok.com/@deesmithletsd... Back up YouTube channel-   / @letsdiscusstheculture   ❗❗❗❗🔔🔔SUBSCRIBE AND CLICK THE BELL ICON 🔔 🔔❗❗❗❗ . Check Out The Video And Leave Us With Your Thoughts By Commenting Below! Dont Forget To LIKE SHARE and SUBSCRIBE As Well As Hitting That NOTIFICATION 🛎 To Get The Latest Content As Soon As It Drops! . "Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing . Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— (1)the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2)the nature of the copyrighted work; (3)the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4)the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. ALL OPINIONS, VIEWS OR ALLEGATIONS , BE THAT IN VIDEOS OR COMMENTS ARE THAT OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT REFLECT THE VIEWS OR OPINIONS OF YOUTUBE NOR THEIR SPONSORS OR AFFILIATES.