У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно She Claimed PTSD — Prosecutor Revealed the Truth или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
A courtroom sentencing hearing takes a dramatic turn after a woman pleads guilty to a violent stabbing that nearly killed the victim. Defense attorneys argue this was a one-time incident, blaming PTSD, alcohol, and mental health issues. The defendant describes remorse, therapy, church involvement, and a clean criminal record. But prosecutors present a chilling account of what really happened that night. According to police and medical reports, the victim was stabbed in the back, puncturing his lung, and then slashed again while bleeding out on the kitchen floor. Emergency responders described him as pale, lethargic, and close to death. The prosecutor disputes claims of a diabetic episode, citing hospital records and intoxication evidence. The judge carefully examines: • PTSD and mental health defenses • Conflicting statements to evaluators • Victim impact evidence • Police and EMS reports • Accountability vs rehabilitation Ultimately, the court accepts a joint recommendation for community control, imposing jail time, strict treatment conditions, and a stern warning: any violation could lead to years in prison. #judgeboyd #courtcam #instantregret #judgeboyd #courtcam #instantregret #juridocs #gaveltime #gavelstrikeusa #caseexposedofficial #truthincourt #judgefleischertv #thecourtdocketnetwork #timeservedcourtwatch #judgejudy #gavelgazerscourtwatch #courtcamtvofficial 00:00 – Sentencing Begins 01:09 – Defense Argues PTSD & Mental Health 02:18 – Defendant’s Emotional Statement 03:40 – Judge Questions Her Memory 07:11 – Prosecutor Describes the Stabbing 08:55 – Police & EMS Evidence 11:09 – Judge Confronts Contradictions 13:00 – Sexual Relationship Explanation 16:36 – Joint Recommendation Discussed 17:26 – Sentence Imposed 19:05 – Judge’s Final Warning coart