Exclusions of Evidence for Public Policy Reasons (FRE 407-411) [LEAP Preview — Evidence: 5/17] скачать в хорошем качестве

Exclusions of Evidence for Public Policy Reasons (FRE 407-411) [LEAP Preview — Evidence: 5/17]

Want the rest of this video? Unlock the full lesson — plus 200+ videos, outlines, study aids, and more — for just $29/month: https://www.studicata.com 00:00 Public Policy Exclusions Overview Introduces Rules 407–411 and explains how they protect socially beneficial activities from being discouraged by fear of courtroom use. 01:14 Examples of Protected Activities Covers specific examples like subsequent remedial measures, settlement negotiations, medical expense offers, plea bargains, and liability insurance. 03:24 How to Approach Public Policy Exclusions Explains the step-by-step analysis: identify if a rule is triggered, know what purposes make the evidence inadmissible, and recognize exceptions. 04:15 Defining Subsequent Remedial Measures (Rule 407) Details the requirement of an injury followed by a measure to make the condition safer, with examples from slip-and-fall to company policy changes. 06:06 When Rule 407 Evidence Is Inadmissible Clarifies that subsequent remedial measures generally cannot be used to prove negligence, culpable conduct, or product defects. 07:05 Exceptions Allowing Rule 407 Evidence Explains when subsequent remedial measures may be admitted, including impeachment, proving ownership or control, and feasibility of precautionary measures. 12:39 Applying Rule 403 After Rule 407 Reminds that clearing Rule 407 doesn’t guarantee admissibility—evidence must still pass the Rule 403 balancing test. 14:54 Introduction to Compromise Offers and Negotiations (Rule 408) Defines Rule 408 and explains that settlement discussions are generally inadmissible to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim. 16:14 The “Disputed Claim” Requirement Highlights the key fact pattern distinction—Rule 408 only applies when the validity or amount of a claim is actually disputed. 18:50 Bad Faith Negotiations Not Protected by Rule 408 Explains how undisputed claims coupled with attempts to leverage legal fees for a lower settlement amount fall outside Rule 408’s protection. 19:07 Ace Law School & Pass the Bar Exam ($29/Month) Access 200+ videos, outlines, study aids, and more — for just $29/month: https://www.studicata.com Thinking about using Studicata? You’re in good company. ✅ Trusted by 100,000+ law students and bar takers ✅ Featured and recommended by top law schools ✅ Named the 81st fastest-growing education company in the U.S. by Inc. See why so many future lawyers choose us to study smarter—not harder: 👉 https://www.studicata.com