У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно What’s the difference between software for managers vs self-managed boards? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Many software companies marketed to HOAs weren’t actually built for HOAs. They were built for another purpose, but then adopted by HOAs as a make-do solution. Large, legacy software platforms assume you have a paid staff who have the time to master their clunky features. There’s a disconnect between a volunteer board’s reality and what solutions are available. CINC Systems Built for portfolio management companies Deep accounting tools, but not user-friendly for volunteers Known for complexity and reliance on formal training TOPS [ONE] (by Enumerate) Longstanding name in HOA software Powerful backend but often clunky and outdated interface More geared toward management firms than self-managed HOAs Vantaca Designed for large-scale association managers Workflow-heavy system that requires formal roles and permissions Not ideal for small or midsize, self-run communities AppFolio (Property Manager) Primarily a rental property and portfolio management platform Offers HOA tools but as a secondary function Often feels too complex or off-target for board-led communities Buildium Also originally created for property managers Used by HOAs but not purpose-built for them Limited flexibility for HOA-specific workflows like ARC or reserve tracking Yardi Enterprise-level solution for large real estate and association portfolios Expensive, complex, and overkill for most self-managed HOAs Not designed for community-first workflows These platforms are considered “legacy” not because they’re obsolete, but because they were built for a different era (or a different user: management companies). Their interfaces, workflows, and assumptions don’t reflect how modern, self-managed communities operate. They often feel like using an enterprise system to manage a neighborhood BBQ. Solume wasn’t built for management companies and then repackaged for HOAs. We started with self-managed communities from day one—specifically with board members who are volunteers, not software pros. Every feature was designed around what boards actually need: tracking dues, violations, ARC requests, reserve planning—without all the bloated extras that just get in the way. And most importantly, it’s dead simple to use. Even the least tech-savvy person on your board can log in and actually use it. #hoa #hoasoftware #condo #condoassociation #hoaboard