Recovery of Crime Weapon. (Principles)Recovery of Weapon From accused in the Eyes of Law. скачать в хорошем качестве

Recovery of Crime Weapon. (Principles)Recovery of Weapon From accused in the Eyes of Law.

#Recoveyofweapon #Recoveryofcrimeweapon #Criminalitigation #FiringCase #MurderCase #BailCase #MurdrTrial #2019SCMR1068 #2019SCMR1156 #2019SCMR1327 #2019SCMR956 #2017SCMR2041 Recovery of the weapon from the accused was legally inconsequential to connect him with the crime, as there was a negative report regarding the matching of the stated recovered crime empty from the spot. (2019 SCMR 1068)  Although the casings/empties tallied with the weapon, however, these were dispatched on a date subsequent to arrest of accused and thus such piece of evidence lost its significance. (2019 SCMR 1156)  Dispatch of casing/crime empty for forensic analysis, a day before accused's arrest was a suspect circumstance. (2019 SCMR 1327)  According to the investigating officer it was a double storied house and recovery was effected from the ground floor where other family members also resided-Memorandum of recovery showed that the pistol was recovered from an open room lying under rough clothes, therefore, it would be unsafe to rely on such recovery for a conviction on a capital charge. (2019 SCMR 956)  Recovery of weapon at the instance of the accused was inconsequential as no report of Forensic Science Laboratory qua the said weapon was available on record. (2017 SCMR 2041)  Alleged recovery of knife from accused as well as the positive reports of Chemical Examiner and Serologist were inconsequential because said recovery was effected after more than one year and three months of the occurrence. (2017 SCMR 1976)  Human prudence would not accept that the accused, after committing murder with a dagger, would choose to preserve it in his own shop rather (26) than throwing it away in any field, water canal, well or other place. (201