У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Rose & Frank Co. v. Crompton & Bros. Ltd. (1925) – или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
in 1913, Rose & Frank Co., an American company, and J.R. Crompton & Bros. Ltd., a British company, agreed that Rose & Frank would be the exclusive seller of Crompton's paper products in the U.S. Their agreement included a clause stating it was not a formal legal contract but an "honourable pledge" between partners. Later, disputes arose, leading Crompton to stop fulfilling orders and end the agreement without notice. Rose & Frank sued, claiming breach of contract. The court decided that the original agreement wasn't legally binding due to the "honourable pledge" clause, but individual orders that were accepted did form binding contracts. This case highlights the importance of clear intentions in business agreements and shows that even without a formal contract, accepted orders can be legally enforceable