FRED X vs Traditional Flow Diversion: Early Clinical Impressions, DAPT Trends, and Sizing Nuances скачать в хорошем качестве

FRED X vs Traditional Flow Diversion: Early Clinical Impressions, DAPT Trends, and Sizing Nuances

FRED X, unpacked by front-line operators: predictable deployment, clearer visualization, true-to-size selection, and practical DAPT testing workflows. Learn more about FRED X: https://www.fred-x.com 🧾 About This Video This interview covers hands-on experience with the FRED X flow diverter—why predictability, precision, and visualization stand out; how distal landing and minimal manipulation streamline deployment; and why true-to-diameter sizing (including a 5.5 mm option) matters. The discussion also touches on evolving DAPT strategies, P2Y12 testing, and hopes for future delivery system innovations. 🎯 What You’ll Learn / Topics Covered • Practical advantages: predictability, precision, and dual helix markers for visualization • Deployment workflow: distal landing, minimal manipulation, and stable opening behavior • Sizing guidance: true-to-diameter selection and availability up to 5.5 mm • DAPT protocols: aspirin + clopidogrel or ticagrelor, with P2Y12 testing for guidance • X Technology context: potential to refine antiplatelet duration (clinical practice–based insights) • Operator learning curve: considerations that can make training smoother 📱 Stay Connected Website: https://www.terumoneuro.com/ X: https://x.com/terumoneuro Instagram:   / terumoneuro   LinkedIn:   / terumoneuro   Corporation Website: https://www.terumo.com/ 💬 Join the Conversation Drop your questions or thoughts in the comments! If this helped you, please 👍 Like, 🔔 Subscribe, and share with someone who might benefit.