IBN BATTUTAH BOHONG ATAU WAN SYUKRI YANG BOHONG? MENJAWAB WAN SYUKRI скачать в хорошем качестве

IBN BATTUTAH BOHONG ATAU WAN SYUKRI YANG BOHONG? MENJAWAB WAN SYUKRI

Sertai Keahlian Channel SidangKalam sebagai tanda sokongan anda.    / @sidangkalamofficial   Video ini membincangkan riwayat Ibn Battutah berkaitan Ibn Taymiyyah dengan mengambil kira kredibiliti Ibn Battutah sebagai tokoh pengembara dan sejarawan yang tidak mempunyai maslahat untuk berdusta. Penjelasan dikemukakan berdasarkan kisah yang diriwayatkan sendiri oleh Ibn Taymiyyah, bahawa pernah berlaku kejadian makhluk halus (jin) menyamar menjadi dirinya, melakukan tugas dan peranan beliau ketika beliau berada dalam tahanan. Oleh itu, tidak mustahil Ibn Battutah benar-benar melihat individu yang menyerupai Ibn Taymiyyah dan melakukan kerja-kerja beliau, tanpa menyedari bahawa hakikatnya ia adalah penyamaran oleh makhluk lain. This video is presented for educational and analytical purposes, examining statements made by Wan Syukri regarding the narration of Ibn Battutah about Ibn Taymiyyah. The discussion focuses on the claim that Ibn Battutah erred or fabricated his report, and reassesses this issue through a careful reading of primary sources rather than assumptions or polemical conclusions. By referring directly to the explanation given by Ibn Taymiyyah himself, the video explores the account of a supernatural impersonation, in which a jinn assumed Ibn Taymiyyah’s appearance and continued his activities outside the prison while Ibn Taymiyyah was confined. In light of this explanation, it becomes reasonable to understand how Ibn Battutah could have witnessed what he reported without any intent to deceive, given his credibility and lack of any discernible motive to lie. The discussion highlights that the real issue lies not in accusing historical figures of dishonesty, but in recognising alternative explanations acknowledged within the scholarly tradition itself. This presentation remains strictly academic in nature, aiming to clarify methodological misunderstandings and encourage responsible engagement with historical reports based on evidence, context, and intellectual discipline rather than conjecture or dismissal.