Omnipotence "Paradox of the Stone" - SOLUTION скачать в хорошем качестве

Omnipotence "Paradox of the Stone" - SOLUTION

This video features the "Circular God Counter-paradox" (CGCP) resolution to the 800-year-old "Paradox of the Stone" omnipotence paradox. This unique CGCP solution offers an easy, step-by-step process for how to nullify the Stone Paradox by way of a counter-paradoxical response. Should anyone ever ask you the Stone Paradox question at a bar, simply scribble out my CGCP's stick figure drawing on a napkin and totally shut them down right there on the spot! True, they will challenge you afterward, but if you read my responses to many of the comments made under this video (and research the stoneparadox.org website) you will be fully equipped to properly counter their challenges. The basis of my resolution is not to prove the existence of Omnipotence (or God) but rather to address and expose the fallacious use of paradoxical logic used within the Stone Paradox. My CGCP resolution takes the same form of paradoxical logic that the Stone Paradox uses to nullify Omnipotence, turns it around, and ultimately uses it to nullify the Stone Paradox instead. The "table is turned" on the Stone Paradox. The argument is that if a paradox cannot stand up against its own use of paradoxical logic, then what good is it? Since my CGCP nullifies the Stone Paradox, the only logical conclusion is that a paradox is incapable of proving the existence (or non-existence) of anything at all. Link to the #1 answer out of over 600 responses to the Stone Paradox offered since its inception on Quora.com: http://qr.ae/TU83HR Link to the official CGCP website listing the history, purpose and many of the most common objections and challenges offered to my CGCP resolution: stoneparadox.org NOTE: My CGCP resolution is not an endorsement of any particular religion or faith nor does it attempt to prove the existence of God or Omnipotence. I will not discuss any religion(s) as no discussion is required within the context of my counter-paradoxical resolution. I am only dealing with the inherent flaws embedded within the fallacious use of paradoxical logic and how a "paradox" is an indicator of absolutely nothing at all. The debate over the existence of God is better suited for specific forums that are more conducive for that kind of a discussion. My CGCP does not make any claims in this regard. It only eliminates an +800 year old perceptual barrier that has stood in the way of everyone having that discussion. © 2016, stoneparadox.org - "Circular God Counter-paradox" The "Circular God Counter-paradox" (CGCP) is copyrighted with the U.S. Copyright office.