У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Taylor Swift Destroyed a $405M Asset — Then Bought It Back или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Taylor Swift didn't become a billionaire by being a pop star. She became a billionaire by running her music career like a private equity fund — and the re-recording strategy is the most ruthless financial move in modern music history. In this breakdown, we decode exactly how Taylor Swift systematically destroyed the value of her own master recordings — a $405 million asset purchased by Shamrock Holdings — and then bought them back at a fraction of the price. This isn't a fan video. This is a business strategy analysis. Taylor Swift Destroyed a $405M Asset — Then Bought It Back 🔍 What we cover: — The $100M Taylor Swift walked away from (FTX) — Why her dad's career at Merrill Lynch changed everything — The equity stake that gave the Swifts boardroom control — How a deal signed at age 14 became a billion-dollar weapon — The Scooter Braun acquisition and Taylor's blockade strategy — Re-recordings: hostile takeover of her own legacy — 13 Management: why she fired the middlemen — The IP fortress: trademarking cat names and song lyrics — Gamified scarcity: selling $165 vinyl clocks — The Eras Tour concert film: $261M with zero studio fees — How Taylor forced Apple and Spotify to change their terms — The full portfolio breakdown: $1.6 billion — What didn't work: merch failures, Ticketmaster, Vienna — Taylor Swift vs. Jay-Z, Rihanna, and Dr. Dre — Four principles anyone can steal from Swift's playbook Taylor Swift's net worth in 2025 is estimated at $1.6 billion, making her the first musician in history to reach billionaire status primarily through music — not sneakers, tequila, or fashion. While Jay-Z diversified into champagne and streaming, and Rihanna built Fenty, Swift vertically integrated into music itself: owning her masters, weaponizing her catalog, cutting out distributors, and turning physical albums into collectibles. Her father Scott Swift was a Merrill Lynch stockbroker and wealth management advisor. The family purchased a 3% equity stake in Big Machine Records. Taylor signed a publishing deal with Sony/ATV at age 14, retaining ownership of her compositions. These early financial decisions — not songwriting talent — laid the foundation for the empire. When Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings acquired Big Machine for $300M in 2019, Swift controlled the publishing rights while Braun controlled the masters. She instituted a sync license blockade, refused commercial use of originals, and re-recorded her entire catalog. Streaming of originals collapsed. Shamrock Holdings, which paid $405M for the masters, found themselves holding a distressed asset. By 2025, Swift had reacquired the originals — at a price far below what Shamrock paid. This video is for anyone interested in celebrity business strategy, music industry economics, intellectual property, wealth building, and entrepreneurship. Whether you're a founder, investor, musician, or just curious about how the biggest names really build their fortunes — this is the business behind the famous face. 📌 Subscribe for more celebrity business breakdowns 🔔 Turn on notifications so you don't miss the next empire decode #TaylorSwift #BusinessStrategy #WealthBuilding #Richsplained