These THREE Manuscripts are WEIRD at Mark 16:9-20 | Defending the Long Ending of Mark | Part 2 скачать в хорошем качестве

These THREE Manuscripts are WEIRD at Mark 16:9-20 | Defending the Long Ending of Mark | Part 2

In the second part of our discussion, James and I talk about the three manuscripts—304, Vaticanus, and Sinaiticus. As the only Greek manuscripts which do not contain Mark 16:9-20, they warrant a deeper look into each of them and their peculiarities surrounding this area of the text. Do these manuscripts actually provide a solid case for removing this passage from our Bibles? I don't think so, come along and take a look at the evidence! Part 1:    • The LONG ENDING of Mark is ORIGINAL! Defen...   Part 3:    • These scribal NOTES and Witnesses of EARLY...   ~~~~~~~~~~~Resource~~~~~~~~~~ James' Blog: https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/ James' YouTube Channel:    / @jamessnappjr   NT Textual Criticism facebook group:   / nttextualcriticism   Purchase his e-book: Authentic, the Case for Mark 16:9-20 https://www.amazon.ca/Authentic-Case-... ~~~~~~~~~~~Contents~~~~~~~~~~ 0:00 Introduction 0:32 Manuscript 304 3:49 Codex Vaticanus 4:53 Is Vaticanus and Sinaiticus Two of the Fifty? 6:16 Matthew 27:49 7:01 The Eusebian Canon 8:42 Vaticanus and the Big Space! 12:56 Memorial Space 15:08 Can't Count? 17:29 Codex Sinaiticus 23:59 Are Sinaiticus and Vaticanus our Most Important Manuscripts? ~~~~~~~~~~~Hashtags~~~~~~~~~~ #LongEndingOfMark #Bible #TextualCriticism