Administrative Law: Public vs. Private Rights – CFTC v. Schor Explained скачать в хорошем качестве

Administrative Law: Public vs. Private Rights – CFTC v. Schor Explained

#AdministrativeLaw #CFTCvSchor #PublicRightsDoctrine Explore the crucial constitutional questions at the intersection of administrative law and judicial power with our deep dive into CFTC v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833 (1986). As part of our Public Rights Doctrine series for me Administrative Law course, this lecture unpacks how the Supreme Court decided when administrative agencies can adjudicate common-law claims – disputes typically reserved for traditional Article III courts. Learn about the factors that allow agencies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to decide matters like contract disputes, including the specialized area of law, the preservation of judicial review, and the parties' choice of forum. Understand the nuances of public versus private rights and how this 1986 landmark decision continues to shape the balance between agency efficiency and the integrity of the federal judiciary. The Court concluded that the CFTC's limited jurisdiction over common law counterclaims, which was incidental to and dependent upon the adjudication of federal reparations claims, constituted a "de minimis" intrusion on the Judicial Branch and did not violate Article III's separation of powers principles. The decision emphasized a pragmatic approach to Article III analysis, balancing judicial independence with congressional goals of efficient dispute resolution. This case is useful for understanding the boundaries of administrative agency power and the delicate balance between efficiency and constitutional safeguards in the U.S. legal system. This is a remake of an older video I made about this case a few years ago. #ArticleIII #AgencyAdjudication #adminlaw #bureaucracy