Lahore High Court Verdict: Burden of Proof, Altered Agreement & Specific Performance Explained скачать в хорошем качестве

Lahore High Court Verdict: Burden of Proof, Altered Agreement & Specific Performance Explained

Lahore High Court Verdict: Burden of Proof, Altered Agreement & Specific Performance Explained In this video, we analyze an important Lahore High Court judgment (Civil Revision No. 5/2022) decided by Justice Masood Anqvi. The case revolves around specific performance, burden of proof, and unilateral alterations in an agreement (Baynama). The court reaffirmed key legal principles: The initial burden of proof always lies on the plaintiff. An agreement containing unauthorized alterations, overwriting, or cuttings is legally unenforceable. Any modification in a contract must be supported by written consent and signatures of both parties. Specific performance is a discretionary relief, not a legal right. The judgment aligns with the Supreme Court precedent PLD 2021 SCMR 431 (Muhammad Riaz Hussain vs Zahoor-ul-Hassan), emphasizing judicial discretion in granting equitable relief. This video is highly beneficial for: Law students Junior lawyers Property & civil litigation practitioners Anyone dealing with sale agreements or Baynamas in Pakistan 📌 Watch till the end for a clear, practical legal breakdown. #PropertyDisputePakistan #LahoreHighCourt #BaynamaCase #SpecificPerformance #CivilCasePakistan #LegalAwarenessPK #PropertyLawPakistan #CourtDecision #LegalRightsPakistan #LawTubePakistan #EmotionalCase #PropertyFraud #CivilLitigation #PakistanLaw #LegalUpdatePakistan