😱30% stalin Tax-விஜயின் திட்டம்|எழிலன் MLA போட்ட Tweet|விஜயை முடக்க திமுக போடும் பலே திட்டம்| скачать в хорошем качестве

😱30% stalin Tax-விஜயின் திட்டம்|எழிலன் MLA போட்ட Tweet|விஜயை முடக்க திமுக போடும் பலே திட்டம்|

The issue revolves around a sharp political accusation made by actor-turned-politician Vijay (Thalapathy Vijay), the chief of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), against the ruling DMK government led by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin.  During an event near Chennai to mark International Women's Day (March 7, 2026), Vijay launched a verbal attack on the state's financial management, introducing a term he called the "Stalin Sir Tax."  The Core Allegation Vijay claimed that a staggering 30% of Tamil Nadu’s state budget is essentially lost to corruption and mismanagement by the ruling leadership. He broke it down as follows:  20% allegedly goes to Chief Minister M.K. Stalin. 10% allegedly goes to the Council of Ministers.  With the state budget being approximately ₹4.39 lakh crore, Vijay argued that this "tax" is the primary reason for the state's fiscal deficit. He asserted that if this corruption were eliminated, the state would have more than enough resources to fund welfare schemes without claiming "lack of funds."  Context and Arguments Welfare Schemes: Vijay pointed to the government's recent cash transfers to women (where ₹5,000 was deposited in bank accounts) as proof that the state does have money. He argued that the government only claims to be broke when it suits their political narrative, while the "Stalin Sir Tax" remains the real drain.  Election Strategy: This is seen as a major escalation in Vijay's campaign for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections. By framing the DMK as "corrupt" and the AIADMK as "incompetent" (or allied with national parties), he is positioning TVK as the only clean, state-focused alternative. DMK’s Response: The ruling party and its allies have dismissed these claims as "immature" and "baseless." They often counter-attack by bringing up Vijay’s own past legal battles, such as a previous tax penalty related to his 2015 film Puli, to question his credibility on financial matters.  Why it Matters This "30% tax" claim is a classic political "soundbite" designed to resonate with voters concerned about corruption. It shifts the debate from policy successes to financial integrity, forcing the ruling government to defend its budget allocations in the public eye. Would you like me to look into the DMK's official rebuttal or the specific budget details Vijay was referencing? [5:03 pm, 08/03/2026] Vetri Pannal: The social media post by DMK MLA Dr. Ezhilan Naganathan regarding the "Sangeetha issue" is part of a heated political exchange following actor-politician Vijay's recent "30% tax" allegation against Chief Minister M.K. Stalin. Here is a breakdown of the issue and why Ezhilan’s post has gained significant traction: 1. The "Sangeetha Issue" Context The "Sangeetha issue" refers to the highly publicized news that Sangeetha Sornalingam, the wife of TVK leader Vijay, has filed for divorce at the Chengalpattu Family Court (as of late February 2024–2026 reports). Her petition reportedly cites: Infidelity: Allegations of an extramarital relationship with a prominent actress. Emotional Cruelty: Claims of mental harassment and abandonment. Residential Rights: A recent interlocutory application seeking to protect her right to live in their Neelankarai matrimonial home. 2. Dr. Ezhilan’s Reaction Dr. Ezhilan Naganathan, the DMK MLA for Thousand Lights, reacted to the situation on social media (X/Twitter) and in press meets. His stance serves as a political counter-attack to Vijay’s "Stalin Sir Tax" comments: Questioning Moral Leadership: Ezhilan and other DMK members have subtly or directly suggested that someone who cannot manage his own "family ethics" or "personal responsibilities" lacks the moral authority to criticize the governance of the state. The "Mirror" Defense: By highlighting the Sangeetha divorce filing, Ezhilan effectively shifted the narrative away from Vijay's corruption allegations. His posts often imply that Vijay's personal life reflects a lack of transparency—the very thing Vijay is accusing the DMK of. Addressing the "Women's Vote": Since Vijay launched his "30% tax" attack during a Women’s Day event, Ezhilan’s focus on Sangeetha’s legal claims (specifically regarding her right to her home and allegations of neglect) is seen as a strategic move to undermine Vijay's appeal to women voters. 3. Political Impact The timing is critical as Tamil Nadu heads toward the 2026 Assembly Elections. TVK's Stance: Vijay has largely remained silent on his personal life, choosing instead to focus on "Stalin Sir Tax" and welfare promises. DMK's Strategy: Dr. Ezhilan’s intervention marks a shift from ignoring Vijay to actively challenging his character. The DMK is using the "Sangeetha issue" to frame Vijay as a "scripted" politician whose personal actions contradict his public messaging.