How to Identify a Principle to Support a LSAT Argument Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set #2 скачать в хорошем качестве

How to Identify a Principle to Support a LSAT Argument Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set #2

Learn how to identify a principle to support an argument using an LSAT Logical Reasoning question from lawhub.lsac.org by highlighting the conclusion in need of support before deliberately eliminating choices that fail to do so for common wrong argument task reasons and selecting the single choice that matches the specifically highlighted conclusion. Please like this video if you find the information in it helpful as you continue your #lsatprep journey, subscribe to this channel to receive notifications about new explanation videos as they become available, or become a member at    / @myguruedge   for access to exclusive explanations to additional LSAT PrepTest and LawHub Drill Set practice problems. To learn more about the LSAT or the law school application process, visit the MyGuru LSAT & Law School Admissions blog at www.myguruedge.com/our-thinking/lsat-and-the-law-school-admissions-process or visit https://www.myguruedge.com/book_intro... to book a free LSAT instruction consultation. To learn more about the instructor, visit https://www.myguruedge.com/team/stefa... LSAC LawHub LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill Set 2, Question 10: Throwing a small piece of paper out of a car window does not cause appreciable harm. Yet that action is wrong, for appreciable harm would result if a large number of people each threw a small piece of paper out of a car window. 10. Which one of the following principles underlies the argument's reasoning? A) Any action that causes more harm than good is wrong. B) If one's action leads many other people to act in a similar way, then one's action is wrong. C) One's action is wrong is appreciable harm would result from many other people acting as one has acted. (Correct) D) An action is not wrong, unless it causes many others to each cause appreciable harm. E) One's action is wrong if it causes appreciable harm.