Academic Publishing Is Broken - Fix It or Replace It? Journals vs Platforms скачать в хорошем качестве

Academic Publishing Is Broken - Fix It or Replace It? Journals vs Platforms

Are traditional journals still serving science - or are they holding it back? In an Oxford-style debate hosted by the Einstein Foundation Award and Berlin University Alliance ‪@WissenAusBerlin‬, Bernd Pulverer, Head of Scientific Publications at EMBO Press ‪@embopress2840‬, and Alexandra Freeman, founder of the community driven platform Octopus ‪@octopus4142‬, debate the future of scholarly communication. Pulverer argues for reforming journals from within - keeping peer review, data integrity, and expert oversight at the centre. Freeman calls for a radical rethink: open, modular publishing where every method, dataset, and analysis is shared as its own "brick" making the towers of science more solid and trustworthy. Explore the arguments for and against each vision. Written summary: https://award.einsteinfoundation.de/e... ----------- (00:00:00) Welcome & Background - Jess Rohmann (00:06:51) Introducing Bernd Pulverer (EMBO Press) (00:07:45) Bernd Pulverer: Reforming, Not Replacing, Journals (00:23:41) Introducing Alex Freeman (Octopus) (00:24:44) Alex Freeman: A New Model for Scholarly Communication (00:39:27) Audience Q&A Introduction (00:39:37) Q1 - Designing a New Publishing System & Filtering Floods of Information (00:50:28) Q2 - Expert Narratives, Curation & Recommendations (00:53:37) Q3 - Reproducibility vs. Idea Sharing in Today's Research Culture (00:58:50) Q4 – What role for institutions? (01:02:26) Q5 - Time & Incentives for Community-Run Scholarly Communication (01:07:38) Q6 – What to learn from scholarly communication in Astrophysics?