У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Your Brain Is Not A Computer (And I Can Prove It Mathematically) | Sir Roger Penrose или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Is ChatGPT conscious? Will AI ever truly "wake up"? Nobel Laureate Sir Roger Penrose says NO—and he has mathematical proof. In this explosive deep dive, Penrose demolishes the computational theory of mind and reveals why consciousness cannot be simulated by any algorithm, no matter how advanced. Discover: → Why Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem proves the brain isn't a computer → The Orch-OR theory: quantum consciousness in brain microtubules → How anesthetics work by disrupting quantum coherence → Why the Turing Test is fundamentally flawed → The "binding problem" and quantum entanglement in neurons → What Penrose and Stephen Hawking debated about AI consciousness → Why GPT-5, Claude, and every future AI will remain philosophical zombies This isn't anti-AI hysteria—this is rigorous physics meeting philosophy of mind. Penrose argues that consciousness requires non-computable quantum processes (objective reduction) that no silicon-based system can replicate. If you think scaling up neural networks will eventually create sentience, this video will shatter that assumption. 🧠 2026 Context: As AI capabilities explode and consciousness debates intensify, Penrose's quantum theory of mind has never been more relevant—or more controversial. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The content shared on this channel is prepared for educational, informational, and commentary purposes. Scientists mentioned or whose visuals are used in the videos are introduced based on information obtained from publicly available sources. The photographs and visuals used are utilized for the purposes of criticism, commentary, education, and information within the scope of fair use principles. This channel has no official affiliation, partnership, or representative relationship with the individuals or institutions mentioned. The shared content does not constitute academic advice or an official opinion; it aims to provide the audience with general knowledge and scientific awareness.