У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно How to Improve Research Transparency или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Transparency is the foundation of credible and impactful research. Here’s how we can raise the bar: 1️⃣ Transparency as a Performance Metric: Lack of transparency in research often masks errors and questionable practices, undermining trust. We can develop actionable strategies to improve reproducibility and credibility by viewing transparency as a research performance issue. 2️⃣ Detailing Research Decisions Matters: Transparent reporting of key decisions—like handling outliers, testing hypotheses, and choosing control variables—enables reproducibility. This ensures other researchers can confidently evaluate, replicate, and build on findings. 3️⃣ Motivating Transparency Through Policy: Journals should adopt submission requirements prioritizing transparency, such as mandatory disclosures about data handling and methodological choices. Clear guidelines create accountability and align incentives for researchers. 4️⃣ Training for Transparency: Many researchers lack sufficient methodological training, which hinders transparency. Investing in doctoral education and providing robust training resources can close this gap and empower researchers to disclose their processes effectively. 5️⃣ The Role of Gatekeepers: Editors and reviewers play a crucial role in evaluating transparency but often face high workloads and limited training. Strengthening editorial processes and providing methodological resources can elevate transparency standards. Get article: Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. 2018. What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1): 83-110. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0011