BREAKING: Trump's Sons SUBPOENAED — Don Jr. & Eric Must Testify, Emergency Motion Filed скачать в хорошем качестве

BREAKING: Trump's Sons SUBPOENAED — Don Jr. & Eric Must Testify, Emergency Motion Filed

*REAL NEWS ANALYSIS* - Based on court filings yesterday. --- *What Happened:* Late yesterday: court filings public. Subpoenas issued to Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Required appear for testimony as witnesses in ongoing trial. Within hours: attorneys filed emergency motion to quash subpoenas (cancel them, excuse from testifying). Motion argues: subpoenas improper, testimony not relevant, compelling them violates rights. *Why Subpoenas Issued:* Prosecution filing: both involved in business transactions and communications central to charges. Have knowledge of specific events, participated meetings where key decisions made. Testimony necessary establish elements of case. References emails, text messages, documents including both as participants/recipients. "Not peripheral figures. Directly involved in conduct at issue. Need testify what they know." Important: neither charged with crime. Called as witnesses, not defendants. But testifying in trial involving father = extraordinarily difficult position. *Emergency Motion Arguments:* 1. *Overly broad* - prosecution asking testimony wide range topics, many not relevant to charges. "Fishing expedition." 2. *Fifth Amendment* - compelling testimony could violate rights. If forced answer questions about transactions/communications, answers could potentially expose them to future criminal liability. Should be allowed assert Fifth Amendment, refuse testify. 3. *Improper purpose* - prosecution trying put on stand not because testimony necessary, but to create spectacle, pressure defendant by forcing sons testify against him. *Prosecution Response:* Not overly broad - specific documents, events. Testimony relevant. Fifth Amendment premature - works per question. Can't refuse show up entirely. No improper purpose - testimony necessary. *Why High-Risk:* If testify, support prosecution = powerful. Family testimony significant weight. If invoke Fifth or unhelpful = backfire. Defense: prosecution desperate. Calculated risk. *Hearing Tomorrow:* Outcomes: grant (don't testify), deny (must testify), middle (narrow scope). Prediction: enforces but limits. *If Enforced:* Scheduled, sworn in, prosecution questions, can invoke Fifth per question, defense cross-exam, excused. *Why Scrutinized:* Media intense. Every word analyzed. Jury watches closely. Family dynamics understood. No neutral outcome = impact. *Statement (4:52 PM):* "Done nothing wrong," "cooperated," subpoenas "overreach." Confident quashed. *My Assessment:* Subpoena = prosecution believes testimony essential. Only do if highly probative, can't get elsewhere. Confident what testimony will be. *Defense Strategy If Enforced:* Discredit testimony - biased, reasons distance, shouldn't have weight. Cross-examine elicit helpful testimony - good faith, professional advice, no criminal intent. Argue prosecution needing family testimony = weak case. Subscribe for tomorrow's hearing outcome.