У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Sophists: Fifth Century Enlightenment? | pt 1 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The word “sophist” is still in common use—and almost exclusively as an insult. Sophistry means clever but dishonest reasoning. Yet the people this label was first attached to were the most sought-after teachers in the most dynamic democratic society the ancient world produced. They advised statesmen, authored constitutions, and theorized language, law, and knowledge. So how did the word become an insult? And more importantly: did these thinkers have a coherent theory of human progress? In Part 1, we examine the Sophists’ historical reputation, their key ideas, and the question that has divided scholars for over a century—were they genuinely enlightened thinkers of progress, or something more ambiguous? 🎯 Key Topics Covered: The Sophists’ reputation—why a word for wisdom became a synonym for deception, and who may have been responsible Guthrie’s case for a “Fifth-Century Enlightenment”: a genuine intellectual revolution in Athens between 460–400 BC Five essential Greek concepts: sophistês, technê, aretê, nomos, and physis—and why they matter beyond ancient philosophy Protagoras’s authentic fragments The Prometheus myth from Plato’s Protagoras—and why Zeus’s democratic distribution of justice may be the most politically significant line in ancient philosophy The internal Sophistic debate between technê (skill accumulation) and eubulia (political judgment) as competing theories of progress Major Themes: The construction of historical reputation: Plato’s dialogues as the near-exclusive source for Sophistic thought Technê as more than technology: a social practice of systematic, teachable human skills that transforms its practitioner Aretê (excellence) as teachable—a direct democratic challenge to aristocratic ideals that privilege inheritance Nomos vs. Physis: if justice is human convention (nomos), it can be challenged—the progressive foundation the Sophists could not fully secure Protagoras’s eubulia (good deliberation) as a challenge to pure technical progress theory—skill alone is not enough and requires political skills Fascinating Historical Insights: Aristophanes’ play The Clouds (423 BC) reflected cultural attitudes towards Sophistic teaching during Protagoras’s own lifetime Protagoras’s agnosticism about the gods was not atheism but an epistemological position—he expressed humility regarding what could be known Zeus’s instruction to Hermes in the Prometheus myth—“Let all have their share”—identified by Guthrie as an egalitarian expression of democratic ideas Protagoras’s own skepticism of technê-based progress as a sole source for societal advancement 📚 Referenced Authors/Works in this Episode: "A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. III: The Fifth-Century Enlightenment" — Guthrie, W.K.C. "Sophists" (Companion to Ancient Philosophy) — Barney, Rachel "The Philosophical Stage" — Billings, Joshua "Protagoras" (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) — Bonazzi, Mauro "A History of Greek Philosophy" (Vol. III) — Grote, George (19th-c. rehabilitation referenced) Plato: "Protagoras" dialogue (primary source for Prometheus myth and Protagoras’s teaching claims) Chapters 00:00 Introduction to the Sophists and Their Legacy 05:37 THe Movement and It’s Moment 09:35 Key Figures of the Sophist Movement 11:52 Protagoras: In His Own Voice 19:37 The Wound That Wouldn’t Close 20:49 What’s Next? 💬 Join the Conversation: Did the Sophists represent a genuine Fifth-Century Enlightenment, or were they something more ambiguous? Were they the first systematic theorists of human progress—or did their framework contain fatal flaws? Share your thoughts in the comments below. 🔔 Subscribe to Notions of Progress for deep dives into the intellectual history of progress, from ancient philosophy to contemporary AI debates. Coming in Part 2: Plato’s response to the Sophists—how he inherited their questions and built an ambitious philosophical system in response. We examine progress not as accumulated skill (techne) and better institutions, but as the vertical ascent of the individual soul toward an objective eternal truth. #NotionsOfProgress #HistoryPodcast #AncientGreece #Sophists #IntellectualHistory #ProgressStudies #GreekPhilosophy #PhilosophyPodcast #HistoryOfIdeas #Protagoras #Techne #AncientHistory #Enlightenment #FifthCenturyAthens #educationalcontent #AI #Guthrie #RachelBarney #JoshuaBillings #Bonazzi #Plato #DemocracyHistory #ProgressTheory #PhilosophyOfHistory