A Father’s Fight Against Child Removal: Exposing Alleged Misconduct in Dependency Court скачать в хорошем качестве

A Father’s Fight Against Child Removal: Exposing Alleged Misconduct in Dependency Court

Summary The content is a transcript of a father expressing deep anger and frustration over the removal of his child by authorities, who placed the child in foster care. He asserts that there was no immediate danger to justify the separation and accuses a lawyer of misconduct in the handling of his case. Highlights 😡 The speaker questions the justification for taking his newborn child without proof of immediate danger. 🤔 He expresses disbelief over marijuana use being cited as a reason for the child’s removal, especially as it is now legalized. 🧐 Accusations are made against the lawyer for allegedly targeting unsuspecting parents and removing their children without cause. 💔 The father expresses his unwavering love for his child and asserts his fundamental right to raise him. ⚖️ He intends to press charges for the damages caused by what he describes as lies and a wrongful case. 🚫 He firmly states that no one has the right to “steal” his child or terrorize his family, regardless of their legal authority. Key Moments (Beta) Q&A: Q: What is the main concern expressed in the transcription? A: The speaker’s main concern is that his newborn was removed without evidence of immediate danger and that DCS acted unjustly, allegedly using questionable grounds such as marijuana use, despite its legalization. He accuses child protective services of exploiting vulnerable families. Q: What legal rights does the speaker believe they have? A: He believes he has a fundamental right to raise his child, supported by federal and state laws, as well as Supreme Court rulings. He also states there is no official removal order on record, which he claims indicates fraud. Q: How does the speaker view the actions of the lawyer mentioned? A: The speaker strongly condemns the lawyer’s actions, accusing them of wrongful actions and asserting that the lawyer’s authority does not justify the harm done to his family. Q: How does the speaker show determination to address the situation? A: The speaker mentions an upcoming appeal, plans to press charges, and expresses an unwavering commitment to fighting for his rights and his child’s return. He emphasizes his love and bond with his child and demands justice for the alleged wrongful removal. Transcript Excerpt: “I love my son with all of my heart; he is my property. I was invested in him throughout the pregnancy and have a bond with him despite your efforts to prevent it. I’m keeping track of his injuries in foster care, and one day I will get justice... Federal and state laws, along with the Supreme Court, confirm my right to raise my child. There is no removal order on the record. Nothing gives you the right to steal from me—just because you are a lawyer doesn’t give you the right to terrorize me and my family.”