У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно POLITICAL SCIENCE SERIES || COMPARATIVE POLITICS || VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM IN POLITICS || CSS или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Lecture: Violence and Terrorism in Politics This lecture addresses one of the most challenging and controversial topics in comparative politics: the role of violence and terrorism in political life. Politics is commonly associated with dialogue, negotiation, and compromise. However, history reveals that violence has frequently been used as a tool for achieving political objectives. Political violence refers to the use of force or coercion to secure political ends, while terrorism constitutes a specific form of political violence in which organized groups deliberately target civilians in order to instill fear and pressure states. This lecture explores the forms of violence, theoretical perspectives, and the place of terrorism in contemporary politics, with case studies drawn from across the globe. Forms of Political Violence Political violence manifests in multiple forms. State violence refers to the use of coercion by governments against their own citizens, as seen in Stalin’s purges or the repression under Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Revolutionary violence emerges when citizens engage in armed struggle to overthrow governments, such as during the French and Bolshevik Revolutions. Ethnic and sectarian violence arises from identity-based conflicts, with examples including the Rwandan Genocide and the wars in Bosnia during the 1990s. Terrorism represents organized violence against civilians for political objectives, with groups such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS leaving global impacts. Finally, civil wars constitute large-scale domestic conflicts, such as the U.S. Civil War or recent conflicts in Sudan and Yemen. Theoretical Perspectives on Violence Several theoretical frameworks explain the persistence of political violence. From a Marxist perspective, violence is considered inevitable because ruling classes rarely surrender power voluntarily. Revolution becomes the mechanism through which social and economic systems are transformed, as seen in the ideas of Lenin and Mao. Frantz Fanon argued that violence in colonized societies can serve as a cathartic tool, enabling oppressed peoples to reclaim dignity, illustrated by the Algerian War of Independence. Realist thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes emphasized that humans are naturally inclined toward violence, making the state’s monopoly on coercion essential to prevent anarchy. Modern theories of political violence highlight relative deprivation, where citizens perceive a gap between expectations and reality. This framework helps explain the Arab Spring, where widespread dissatisfaction triggered mass protests and violent uprisings. Terrorism in Politics Terrorism requires separate attention as a distinct form of violence. It involves the deliberate use of force by non-state actors, usually targeting civilians, to create fear and achieve political aims. Various types of terrorism can be identified. Left-wing terrorism arises from revolutionary groups seeking socialism or communism, exemplified by the Red Army Faction in Germany. Right-wing terrorism is driven by fascist or nationalist ideologies, with Neo-Nazi groups in Europe as notable examples. Religious terrorism uses faith to justify violent action, as seen with the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS. Separatist terrorism is associated with ethnic groups striving for independence, such as the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka or ETA in Spain. The 9/11 attacks by Al-Qaeda reshaped global politics by initiating the War on Terror, leading to U.S. interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq and establishing new international security regimes. Conclusion Violence and terrorism reveal the darker dimensions of political life, where coercion rather than negotiation dictates outcomes. Comparative politics recognizes that while political violence is destructive, it has also been a force of transformation, shaping revolutions, state responses, and global security systems. Terrorism, in particular, demonstrates the power of non-state actors to influence international politics and redefine state behavior. Understanding these dynamics is essential for grasping the complexity of political processes in both historical and contemporary contexts.