Crypto as Collateral скачать в хорошем качестве

Crypto as Collateral

The CFTC’s guidance emphasizes a risk-based, technology-neutral approach to digital asset collateral. Eligible Assets and Risk Management: While the NAL Relief initially limits collateral to BTC, ETH, and qualified payment stablecoins, the broader guidance on tokenized RWAs opens the door to other assets. The central tenet is that the underlying risk profile of an asset is unchanged by tokenization. As stated in the guidance, “The use of digital ledger technology to tokenize an asset need not change the fundamental characteristics of that asset.” Firms must apply robust valuation and haircut frameworks that account for both the underlying asset’s risk and any additional operational or custody risks introduced by tokenization. Legal Enforceability and the UCC: A critical requirement is that market participants must ensure they have a legally enforceable interest in the collateral. This has significant implications under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The 2022 Amendments to the UCC, which introduce a new Article 12 for “Controllable Electronic Records” (CERs), provide a modern legal structure for perfecting a security interest in digital assets through a new test of “control.” This allows a lender like an FCM to establish a legally sound claim on digital collateral, a prerequisite for its use in regulated markets. Segregation and Custody: Existing rules requiring customer funds to be segregated and held at eligible custodians continue to apply. However, the program does not resolve the tension between traditional concepts of “control” and the technological realities of digital asset custody (e.g., private keys, omnibus wallets), placing the onus on firms to design and validate compliant custody solutions. 2. Practical Application: The DeReticular/RIOS Model for RWA Liquidity The DeReticular project’s “Operation Octagon” provides a concrete case study of how the new regulatory framework can be leveraged to solve long-standing liquidity challenges in physical industries like agriculture and energy. 2.1. The Physical Asset Layer: Node 4 in Kaabong, Uganda Project Overview: Node 4, known as “The Green Industrial Engine,” is a 7,000-acre Smart Eco-Industrial Park (SEIP) in Uganda designed to operate as a “Green Special Economic Zone.” Industrial Process: The facility employs a circular economy model centered on industrial hemp. Energy Production: Hemp biomass and agricultural waste are converted via plasma gasification into 10-11 MW of carbon-negative baseload power. Value Creation: This process yields two primary assets: clean energy and high-value, verifiable Carbon Removal Credits. Zero-Waste Model: Byproducts like biochar are repurposed as fertilizer or construction materials, eliminating landfill waste. 2.2. The Digital Verification Layer: RIOS and the “Digital Twin” NFT The physical output of Node 4 is translated into a verifiable digital asset through the Rural Infrastructure Operating System (RIOS). Data Ingestion: The on-site “RIOS Pilot Command Center,” a ruggedized, solar-powered container, uses an array of sensors to gather real-time data on physical outputs (e.g., weight of harvested biomass, energy produced). Cryptographic Verification (zkVerify): RIOS uses Zero-Knowledge Proofs to cryptographically hash this sensor data. This creates an immutable, publicly verifiable proof that the assets were produced, without disclosing proprietary operational secrets. This acts as a “truth machine.” The “Digital Twin” NFT: The verified data payload is minted into a dynamic NFT. This NFT is not a speculative digital collectible; it is a legal “Digital Twin” that serves as the digital title of ownership for the specific batch of hemp biomass, energy, and carbon credits produced.