У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Prevention of Corruption l Discharge l Quashing l Dr. Jinesh Soni l 2025 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In anti-corruption cases, "discharge" and "quashing" serve distinct purposes: discharge ends the prosecution against a defendant, while quashing an order requires further examination of the case. Here's a more detailed explanation: Discharge: A discharge order means the court finds there's no sufficient evidence to proceed with the trial against the accused and the case is terminated. This is a decision made by the trial court, often after considering the prosecution's case and the evidence presented. A discharge order is a final order, meaning the accused is free from the charges in that specific case. Quashing: Quashing, on the other hand, means the court cancels or sets aside a legal order or proceeding, like a First Information Report (FIR) or a charge sheet. This is typically done by a higher court, such as a High Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction. Quashing doesn't necessarily mean the accused is innocent, but rather that the legal process or the basis for the case is flawed or invalid. After quashing, the case can be re-examined or the proceedings restarted if the quashing order is overturned. Key Differences: Purpose: Discharge ends the prosecution, while quashing challenges the validity of the legal process or the basis of the case. Court Level: Discharge is a trial court decision, while quashing is typically a higher court action. Outcome: Discharge leads to the end of the case, while quashing requires further action, potentially leading to a new examination or restarting the proceedings. Examples in Anti-Corruption Cases: A trial court might discharge an accused person in an anti-corruption case if the prosecution fails to present sufficient evidence to prove the charges. A High Court might quash a charge sheet or FIR in an anti-corruption case if it finds the allegations are baseless or the investigation was flawed. Dr. Jinesh Soni Advocate 9772946899 #Discharge #quashing #preventionofcorruptionact #soniarenaajmer #chargesheet