У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно SIT-AT-HOME DEBATE: LEGALITY, RIGHTS & REALITIES или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In the Southeast today, few issues spark as much emotion, debate, and daily disruption as the sit-at-home directive. But beyond the headlines, beyond the politics, and beyond the fear, there are questions many people are still asking quietly: Why do some still comply? What rights are involved? And how far can a government go in enforcing a ban? On this thought-provoking edition of our Morning Show conversation segment, we sit down with Ozo Igbonekwu Ogazimora, Editor-in-Chief of SBSGreat Interviews and an Attorney at Law, to unpack the sit-at-home situation from a legal and civic perspective. This isn’t just another shouting match; it’s a deep dive into the law, the constitution, and the lived realities of citizens caught in the middle. With Anambra State Governor Chukwuma Soludo pushing firm enforcement against the Monday sit-at-home, legal debates have moved from courtrooms to living rooms. Can a state compel economic activity in the name of order and development? Where do citizens’ rights to safety, association, and expression intersect or clash with government authority? And crucially, what does Nigerian law actually say about enforcing compliance in situations shaped by non-state actors? Ozo Igbonekwu offers “another perspective,” one that looks at the roots of compliance, not just the resistance to enforcement. He explores the psychology of fear, the power of collective action (or inaction), and the legal grey areas that make this issue more complex than it first appears. Because for many traders and workers, staying home isn’t always political, sometimes, it’s about perceived safety, social pressure, or uncertainty about consequences. The conversation also examines the legality of Governor Soludo’s sit-at-home ban enforcement. What tools does a state government legally possess? What are the limits? Could certain enforcement actions be challenged in court? And how can authorities balance restoring normalcy with protecting fundamental rights? This episode goes beyond soundbites. It is about understanding why compliance persists, how enforcement is framed legally, and what this tug-of-war means for democracy, governance, and everyday survival in the Southeast. Whether you agree with the policy, question the enforcement, or simply want clarity, this discussion lays out the arguments with insight, context, and just the right amount of legal firepower. Because sometimes, to solve a problem, you first have to understand the reasons behind it. #afiatvofficial #dstv254 #gotv17 #morningshow #sitathome #AnambraPolitics #soludo #NigeriaLaw #civicrights #southeastnigeria #politicaldebate #afiatv #morningshows #publicaffairs