How Characters Evolve | Love Life (2020) and The Deuce (2017) | Starfighter Reviews скачать в хорошем качестве

How Characters Evolve | Love Life (2020) and The Deuce (2017) | Starfighter Reviews

If you have a recommendation on what TV show I should do an anlysis next please comment below! ❐ Support Me On Patreon ❏ patreon.com/user?u=84072954 ❐ Summary ❏ I thought it would be cool to make a video on how TV series sometimes use "Time-Skips" to evolve characters throughout its seasons. For this analysis I talk about two TV series I very much enjoyed watching. The Deuce is a really good TV series with amazing characters. Lori Madison is the character I'm going to highlight when I talk about The Deuce. Her character develops through eight years in the series and this is made possible because of "Time-Skips". However I must say, with The Deuce having such great characters I do however disliked that most of the subplots in the series were pointless. Love Life is another TV series that focuses a lot on character development. I must be honest the plot and characters of Love Life isn't really that good but the is worth watching because of the conversations to be had about each episode. Darby is the character I will be highlighting when I go into detail about Love Life. _______________________________________________________________________ ❐ My Podcast ❏ Starfighter Full Movie Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/2KtYSw0... _______________________________________________________________________ ❐ SOCIALS ❏ ✧ Discord:   / discord   ✧ Instagram:   / starfighterreviews   ✧ Twitter:   / starfighterrev1   _______________________________________________________________________ ❐ Time Stamps ❏ (0:00) - Time Skips (Intro) (1:16) - The Hopeless Romantic (Love Life) (4:05) - Lori... The Porn star (The Deuce) ________________________________________________________________________ ❐ Fair Use ❏ Video makers often take as their raw material an example of popular culture, which they comment on in some way. They may add unlikely subtitles. They may create a fan tribute (positive commentary) or ridicule a cultural object (negative commentary). They may comment or criticize indirectly (by way of parody, for example), as well as directly. They may solicit critique by others, who provide the commentary or add to it. Video makers have the right to use as much of the original work as they need to in order to put it under some kind of scrutiny. Comment and critique are at the very core of the fair use doctrine as a safeguard for freedom of expression. So long as the maker analyzes, comments on, or responds to the work itself, the means may vary. Commentary may be explicit (as might be achieved, for example, by the addition of narration) or implicit (accomplished by means of recasting or recontextualizing the original). In the case of negative commentary, the fact that the critique itself may do economic damage to the market for the quoted work (as a negative review or a scathing piece of ridicule might) is irrelevant. Sometimes video makers quote copyrighted material (for instance, music, video, photographs, animation, text) not in order to comment upon it, but because it aptly illustrates an argument or a point. For example, clips from Hollywood films might be used to demonstrate changing American attitudes toward race; a succession of photos of the same celebrity may represent the stages in the star’s career; a news clip of a politician speaking may reinforce an assertion. ________________________________________________________________________