Pulse Oximetry Pitfalls скачать в хорошем качестве

Pulse Oximetry Pitfalls

Homepage: EMNote.org ■ 🚩Membership: https://tinyurl.com/joinemnote 🚩ACLS Lecture: https://tinyurl.com/emnoteacls In this lecture, we will discuss the pitfalls of using pulse oximeter in assessing patients with dyspnea. Pulse oximetry is a non-invasive method of measuring the oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in arterial blood. It has become a ubiquitous tool in clinical practice, providing a continuous estimate of a patient's oxygenation status. However, there are several important limitations and potential pitfalls associated with the use of pulse oximetry, particularly in the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea or respiratory distress. The fundamental principle behind pulse oximetry involves the different absorption spectra of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin for red and infrared light. The ratio of these absorption values is used to calculate the oxygen saturation (SpO2). This calculation assumes that only two species of hemoglobin are present: oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. However, in certain clinical situations, other hemoglobin species may be present, leading to inaccurate SpO2 readings. One such situation is carbon monoxide poisoning. Carboxyhemoglobin, formed by the binding of carbon monoxide to hemoglobin, has a similar absorption spectrum to oxyhemoglobin. Since oximeters misinterpret carboxyhemoglobin as 100% oxyhemoglobin, SpO2 will trend toward 100% in patients with significant carbon monoxide poisoning, potentially masking the severity of their condition. This can lead to a false sense of reassurance and delayed treatment. Another limitation of pulse oximetry is its inability to detect hypoxemia in the setting of abnormal hemoglobin species, such as methemoglobin and sulfhemoglobin. Methemoglobinemia can occur due to certain drugs, toxins, or inherited disorders, while sulfhemoglobinemia is typically associated with sulfur compound exposure. Sulfhemoglobinemia can mimic methemoglobinemia clinically and by SpO2 measurements. Since oximeters misinterpret methemoglobinemia as 85% oxyhemoglobin, SpO2 will trend toward 85% in patients with significant methemoglobinemia. Thus, SpO2 can either overestimate or underestimate the oxygen saturation of patients with methemoglobinemia or sulfhemoglobinemia. Furthermore, pulse oximetry does not consider hemoglobin level, and has limitations in accurately measuring oxygen saturation at extremes of hemoglobin concentration. For non-hypoxic cases of severe anemia with hemoglobin levels below 5 g/dL, pulse oximeters may overestimate the oxygen saturation. Conversely, in patients with polycythemia or high hemoglobin levels, pulse oximeters may underestimate the oxygen saturation. It is also important to note that pulse oximetry measures the functional saturation of hemoglobin, which may not accurately reflect the overall oxygen content of the blood, particularly in cases of dyshemoglobinemias or shifts in the oxygen-hemoglobin dissociation curve. Pulse oximetry does not consider A-a gradient, supplemental O2 can mask severe pulmonary process. In such situations, arterial blood gas analysis provides a more comprehensive assessment of oxygenation status and acid-base balance. Fluctuations in PaO2 can lead to rapid, unpredictable changes in SpO2 that may be missed by intermittent monitoring, thus, continuous SpO2 monitoring is suggested for dyspneic patients. In addition to these limitations, pulse oximetry can be affected by factors such as poor perfusion, motion artifacts, and the presence of certain dyes or pigments. Conditions such as hypothermia, hypotension, or peripheral vascular disease can lead to reduced peripheral perfusion, resulting in unreliable SpO2 readings. Similarly, excessive patient movement can introduce motion artifacts, compromising the accuracy of the measurements. Another pitfall is that pulse oximetry measures peripheral oxygen saturation, which can lag behind changes in central arterial oxygenation. This delay may mask acute deterioration in some patients. When assessing patients with dyspnea or respiratory distress, it is crucial to interpret pulse oximetry readings in the context of the patient's clinical presentation, physical examination findings, and other diagnostic modalities. Relying solely on pulse oximetry can potentially lead to missed diagnoses or inappropriate management decisions. Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) provides a more comprehensive assessment of oxygenation and acid-base balance. ABG allows the calculation of A-a gradient which helps clinicians narrow down the differential diagnosis for hypoxemia. One should consider ABG analysis when appropriate.